Rbz wrote...
I wholeheartedly agree that the concepts of good and evil are subjective, but that's not the point.
https://www.fakku.net/viewtopic.php?t=29433
Taking the situation from this thread (which was very apropos), would you think of the person who does nothing as evil, even though in that thread you said (if you responded) that they are responsible for the murder as well as the actual murderer? Would you allow for such a thing as indifference, which makes the person neither good nor evil?
I'm still having an internal debate over this useless subject (I'll forget about it soon enough) and I was interested in what others though of this.
In a case like this, where you have the power to save someone, but choose not to, then yes, you are as bad as the actual murderer, but not necessarily "evil". Evil is (at least for me) a very strong word. And no one is nether evil nor good, since it's our actions that define who we are. Let's put it as this; Someone rapes and kills a woman, but later on takes a bullet for his friend, or a stranger for that part. Is that man good or evil? No one is pure "good" or "evil", but no one is truly "neutral" either.
Thus a man that sees evil at work, but choose not to do anything. Perhaps out of fear for himself, is neither good nor bad. This action is not meant to be evil, perhaps (as in the second above post) he thinks about his family, what favor would he do them if he got himself killed? Would he be evil if he didn't think about his family and(knowing that he probably had no chance of survival) choose to fight this guy for the sake of "good", even if that would only bring pain to others?
One can brood over his forever.
(I am sorry if my lack of skill in the english language made this post kinda confused.)