SenatorAnonymous wrote...
Actually, the Chinese were Maoists, which fall under the authoritarian branch of communism. True communism, the kind which Marx envisioned, is anarchic in nature. They are also moving farther and farther away from socialism because they have essentially adopted unencumbered free market capitalism.
It's now time for a little lesson in communism.
Just as SenatorAnonymous stated, true communism as Marx (and Engels) envisioned actually has no government. The workers all help each other out under the principle "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs." Granted, everyone would have to curb all of their desires for more than what they have, so it's more of a fairytale world.
True socialism, as Marx and Engels originally envisioned it, was only a middleman between Capitalism and Communism, a quick phase in which the government would ensure that production would serve the people, and then all forms of leadership would simply fade away, without revolution; they just wouldn't be necessary.
Thus, there are deviations on these theories, such as Marxism-Leninism, so that the rulers in charge could say that their attempts at Communism weren't failures (since true communism has no government), but rather Socialism was tweaked so that they could actually achieve Communism.
Hopefully this was a helpful insight on Communism (more that a lot of you probably wanted to know). If there are any discrepancies, please let me know.