kingtipop wrote...
i think statistics can speak for themselves... violent crime, social problems, whatever all being higher in areas of drug usage. It doesn't matter if a person says they will abuse it or not, the fact is that even if one person doesnt someone else is bound to, and that person is where the problem starts.
I think you have that backwards. Drug usage does tend to show up in areas where violent crime, social problems, and the like are prevalent. Drug use is prevalent in every aspect of human society, even the areas with low crime rates.
kingtipop wrote...
Then to everyone that thinks its wrong to legalize alchohol while keeping drugs illegal is wrong- theres simply not much you can do about it. Alchohol is too huge of a part of any economy, the many millions a year people make in illicit drug deals doesnt even compare to the huge amount large companies make off selling beers, wines, etc. There are of course mny other reasons why alcohol is much more sustainble in a community than drugs but thats just too complicated to go into..
Alcohol may be more sustainable in a community and people may make a shit load of money off of it, but that doesn't mean it should be legal. I'm personally speaking on behalf of weed, mushrooms, and a couple of other very safe naturally occurring substances, which in truth are falsely branded as "drugs" in the first place.
Quotation from Wikipedia:
Despite increasing amounts of money being spent on prohibition, drugs have become more accessible, cheaper, and more potent. The illegality of injectable drugs leads to a scarcity of needles which causes an increase in HIV infections. The money spent on both increased health costs due to HIV infections and drug prohibition itself causes a drain upon society. Despite the fact that most drug offenders are non-violent, the stigma attached to a conviction can prevent employment and education.
Its also because of the illegality of drugs that there are such a number of health risks, aside from the aforementioned HIV problem it presents. With illegal distribution a person never knows what they are using or how potent it is for that matter. Although I don't advocate the use of heroin or coke, legal distribution would provide less of a risk, as street dealers are known for cutting their product with substances such as brick dust, quinine, fentanyl, and a myriad of other dangerous shit. I had a friend who died because someone cut his heroin with battery acid. I have a lot of experience with drugs, I know all the risks that can be avoided by legalization.
Moral concerns aside, legalizing drugs would be the best course of action to take. As long as drugs are illegal, they're going to be on the streets. The only way governments can have any significant impact on the issue of drug use worldwide and within their respective countries is to take care of their citizens. The wars on drugs are causing more deaths than they are preventing. A forceful approach to such a situation is not the way to go about resolving it.