Azuran wrote...
That's idiotic. You pay for the music, you get to use it any way you want. Musicians have no right to complain especially when they're making money off it.
So you wouldn't mind if you created something and someone used it to torture people? I think a lot of the musicians upset over this don't care about the money; they're concerned about their songs, which they created to bring joy to people, being used to cause harm.
Also, it says nowhere in the article that the musicians are being paid for this at all. Typically, artists are offered money by people who want to use their music, and an artist can decline the offer if he doesn't want his music used in such a way. But it seems like the military is just using whatever songs they want, upsetting the artists, and they aren't paying anything. Sounds kind of illegal, actually.
But what's more important here, the fact that the music is being used without permission or the fact that these people are being tortured? Especially in Guantanamo Bay, where not everybody is an evil terrorist whose eyes glow red in the dark.
From the article:
Ruhal Ahmed, a Briton who was captured in Afghanistan, describes excruciating sessions at Guantanamo Bay. He said his hands were shackled to his feet, which were shackled to the floor, forcing him into a painful squat for periods of up to two days.
“You’re in agony,” Ahmed, who was released without charge in 2004, told Reprieve. He said the agony was compounded when music was introduced, because “before you could actually concentrate on something else, try to make yourself focus on some other things in your life that you did before and take that pain away.
“It makes you feel like you are going mad,” he said.
Ruhal Ahmed, a Briton who was captured in Afghanistan, describes excruciating sessions at Guantanamo Bay . . . “You’re in agony,” Ahmed, who was released without charge in 2004, told Reprieve.
He was tortured, but he apparently did nothing. If he did do something, they didn't have enough evidence to bust him for it, but they still put him through hell. I guess it is better to hurt a possibly innocent man than not hurt a possibly guilty man.