El Chacal wrote...
Nejik wrote...
Magic changed everything.
This was a great opening line. It grabs the readers attention right away and makes him want to read more.
Unfortunatly, you follow it up with way too much exposition.
Way, way too much exposition.
You're too worried about explainning everything to the reader in one sitting, and it's just too much to take in.
Instead of
explainning what's going on, you should take a more interesting approach.
You should
show what's going on. Many writers assume that their readers are complete idiots that can't put 2 and 2 together and thus feel the urge to take them by the hand and explain everything. I get it that you want to tell us about this great little world you've created, but there are better ways to accomplish this.
Dialogue, for example, is a great way of doing it.
If you really feel the need to properly inform the reader of what's going on, make two (or more) characters talk about it in a casual way. This can be a bit tricky, but there are many great writers who've done this masterfully and you can learn a lot from them just by examining a few of their works.
George R. R. Martin is a great example of this. If you haven't read Game of Thrones yet, you should do so immediatly. If you have, read it again, but this time, focus on the way that he fills you in on what's going on in his world.
I enjoyed the exposition. If I don't know what is going on in the story, how can I enjoy it? Would discourage Nejik from reading the Game of Thrones, by the way which I disliked. I disagree that many writers assume that readers are idiots. It is the other way round. Too few writers assume that readers are idiots. (And that in my book is a bad thing) Books in the past tend not to have that problem.
And why is assuming that the reader is an idiot a bad thing? The world that is introduced in this story is completely alien to us. Leaving the reader to guess what is going on in a world which we are unfamiliar with is too demanding for me. Your entry, Blood and Absinthe, contained quite a lot of exposition which I enjoyed. It did not impede me from enjoying the story. On the contrary, it was one of the crucial factors that made me enjoy the story. That exposition was fortunately dialogue-free.
(This dislike of third person exposition really tempts me to recommend the Lord of the Rings prologue which is purely exposition.)
Explaining what happened via dialogue against instead of a monologue has to be one of the most confusing ways to tell a story. The characters know what they are talking about so they wouldn't bother with exposition. Furthermore, it is very difficult to keep up with dialogue since fragmented sentences are used and it keeps on switching to and fro between characters.
Show not tell applies to movies and acting. I don't think it really applies to the written word where the only medium of communication is text. Movies on the other hand can employ imagery, body language and so on, something that writing doesn't possess.
I can tell you that Martin's magnum opus was too much for me to take in. The non-prologue was so confusing that I dropped the book in disgust and went for the better written chapter summaries.
You may have read this:
https://www.fakku.net/forums/writing-and-fanfiction/summer-2014-leonard267-hates-a-game-of-throness-prologue-114426