You know what, if this is going to stay in the "Requests" section when I wasn't truly requesting anything, no one is going to respond to it as the users that this is directed towards will never come across it. I'll check back later, but (if this doesn't have at least one legitimate response) I'll request it to be locked.
I didn't waste my time at 12:00-ish last night putting those images together for nothing.
Maybe use an imagehost that doesn't block requests referred by FAKKU.
Other users don't see shit,... ok, this is what they see:
...and the filename, "blocked domain" is the clue of what's going on.
(...and no, most users won't bother to copy & paste a link)
Try sadpanda:
https://www.fakku.net/image-404/
Spoiler:
Spoiler:
Another thing: If you want to discuss things, make a thread in the appropriate discussion board. If you have a request, make (yet another) thread here in Requests.
PS: the art style (and story fragment) reminds me of "Oniichan to wa Yobitakunai" (namely the 3rd story, so far only released in H-magazines) by Saegusa Kohaku (he also has a tankoubon called "Imoten" filled with these kind of stories), though it's kinda hard to tell as the screenshots are very distorted.
Here are the links to the stories on FAKKU:
https://www.fakku.net/manga/onii-chan-to-wa-yobitakunai-1-english
https://www.fakku.net/manga/onegai-sister-plus-2nd-period-english
https://www.fakku.net/manga/onegai-sister-plus-final-english
PS.PS: ...and stop whining it won't accomplish anything and will only make you seem like an attention seeking cunt.
I checked and it's indeed as you wrote: when the user clicks the artist's name *from* a doujinshi or manga, they indeed only get a filtered list by the author depending on what sort of material they've been browsing.
For instance 10mo has both a doujinshi and a manga on FAKKU. Using your method you might get this link:
https://www.fakku.net/manga/artists/10mo
If you want a complete list, all you need is to remove the category prefix from the url:
Yes, it is banned here.
And yes, people need to realize that pedophile psychos would rape children with or without reading/watching loli hentai anyways, but a sane (and reasonable) person can see the differance between drawings and flesh and blood.
So... that basically means Kodomo no Jikan is banned here, too? Because at least the manga could definitely be considered lolicon.
So even Fakku is banning things so stay in line with the US government? :-(
FAKKU ceased the hosting of such material because the advertisers threatened to cease association with FAKKU unless that was done so. That'd been the death-knell of the site. The only alternative would've been to mandate a paid subscription for access.
Since this thread is (yet another) discussion about the legality / morality of underage characters in manga in the West and not discussion of actual eromanga, it has been moved to a more appropriate forum.
Sorry for the inconvenience caused.
To OP question: I ascribe to Isaiah Berlin's concept of negative liberty, that is freedom is a state when one is not oppressed in any shape or form, an absence of coercion. Naturally, on its own, this is a problematic concept, for men are very much interdependent, so by its nature it has to have limits. Thus, one men's freedom can only extend until it impedes another's.
In practice this means, we should only ever restrict freedom when there's a danger of oppression and harm. Vaccination is a good example: by not getting shots, one undermines the herd immunity of the vaccine and therefore endangers the other citizens, therefore mandating vaccination is a justified restriction, since the oppression of the citizen (getting a shot, the minuscule danger posed by a thoroughly tested vaccine) is grossly outweighed by the possible harm to everyone else (rubella and pertussis plagues are *deadly*).
So I must ask: what danger does art that portrays erotic encounters of underage fictional characters pose to citizens?
In case of real child porn, the answer is obvious: children are abused during the production of the "product". So the production of child porn by its nature should be prosecuted, as the psychological damage from child abuse is a well documented thing. (Albeit one the general public and politicians at large usually grossly misunderstand).
However no children were involved in the creation of the material we're discussing. It's all in the imagination of the artist.
Unlike child porn involving the exploitation of children, I see no clearcut case for prosecuting material when the actors are imaginary. The only argument one could make is that the material creates more demand for child porn... however does it really?
I find that argument strenuous even when invoked for child porn. In that case though, there's the undeniable fact that at the source of the "supply chain" child abuse is taking place, and therefore punitive action at all phases seem acceptable. Can we truly draw a parallel here?
Let's approach the issue from the other end too, that is the readers. What crime do they perpetrate? ...no whatsoever crime. There's no victim, only dirty thoughts...
...and that is the heart of the problem: thought-crime.
Does the state have any right to judge people (or their pastimes) based on mere thoughts? I think not. When we give any authority the right to do that we're inevitably going beyond the mandate of negative freedom. Instead letting people decide for themselves how they want to live, we're ascribing a "right" way to do so.
This is not surprising though. Isaiah Berlin himself warned that this could happen:
Negative freedom should never be viewed as an absolute truth, for the moment its treated as such, it'll loose it very meaning, that of individual choice.
Right now the artist pages work as you wish them, not how you imagine things are.
????
If you click on the actual links on either Manga/Artist or Doujinshi/Artist, you'll be taken to a page that lists *both* Manga *and* Doujinshi by the author.
So right now, the feature is working as you wish, not as how the layout would imply. (Yeah, IMHO this is a bug). IIRC Jacob is focusing on getting the file-server issue sorted, so this is likely to remain for a while.
Jake also said, he'd like to overhaul the search page, so IMHO things would be more streamlined and clear once that happens... that's in the far future though.
BTW, the old unified lists are still working:
https://www.fakku.net/artists --> Unified List of Artists
https://www.fakku.net/newest --> Newest Additions to Site
This is a copy & paste from the Comic Rack forums, a big damn comparison of comic readers by quidam:
List of Comic & Manga Viewers (CBR/CBZ Software)
Dear reader, if you googled this page in looking for Comic Viewer (CBR, CBZ) read no further. Go, download ComicRack and have fun with your eComics! You won't find anything better for Windows below there.
Try alternative firmware - http://ebookapplications.com/2010/09/power-management-optimizations-cbrcbz-and-rar-support/
Amiga, Atari, C64:
just joking... ;)
Close-Up on selected programs
CDisplay:
A legend. Program that started it all. Set the standards and made way for others. It was the first comic viewer that gained large popularity. Keys to success: simple & fast. Despite being unmaintained since 2006, still has a lot of fans ("I'm fine with paper and pencil" kind of people). Well, everyone that's into digital comics long enough must have heard of and used CDisplay.
Pros:
very fast
great mouse navigation options
supports nested archives
sentimental value
Cons:
R.I.P. A.D. 2006
bugs here and there
simple to the bone (but that goes to Pros for others)
Version used: 1.8.1.0 (April 2004), 1.8.5.0 (June 2006)
Links:
Official site (dead) - http://web.archive.org/web/20071011001044/www.geocities.com/davidayton/CDisplay
Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CDisplay
1.8.1.0 downloaded from: http://www.techknight.com/blog/2009/07/19/here-is-where-to-get-cdisplay/(Note: That's a third party site. For safety reasons remember to check the file with your anti-virus software before installing)
Direct, open source successor to CDisplay. A clone that, IMO, never really outmatched its predecessor. Not many features were added that would give it clear advantage over CDisplay. Moreover, not all CDisplay features were implemented. The development stopped in 2006 and project is now considered being discontinued. Still, it was somewhat popular and gave people hope after death of CDisplay (but only to go the same path to software graveyard, despite open source nature). ;)
ComicsViewer:
Little known Chinese program for reading eComics. Has official English version though. 'Decent' is the word that comes to mind after playing with it for a while.
CoView:
Nobody expects Spanish Inquisition or... a comic viewer! Note: press 'i' to switch language to English after fist start. CoView runs directly in fullscreen mode, there is no windowed mode, only an option to minimize. Also, no menubars or configuration dialogs. Right click to display the short help about available hotkeys. A little strange interface, needs time to get used to. But not bad exactly, just different.
Pros:
database ersatz - adding folders to collection, marking files as read/reading/unread. Promising.
eComic:
Open source disaster. Unfinished product with lazy development. Failed grad project? Recommended only for masochists with bad-software fetish. ;)
eManga:
Finally an application that aspires to be something more than just a viewer. Has Library with search and Get Info inspired by ComicRack/ComicBookLover. And unique Mangacast feature. Multi-platform, promising piece of software. Yet, as a viewer it fails to competitors both in terms of speed and functionality.
Pros:
Library with Get Info metadata
search / filter (similar to ComicRack)
Mangacast (subscribing and automatic downloading files directly to library)
Cons:
slower and lacking file browser and page viewer
stupid .manga format (renamed cbz with its own XML schema) required to add files to library. Converting process is manual (sic!). Just beyond my patience.
Hamana - another good Japanese viewer. I would recommend it over all others if it hasn't forcefully fitted all images to window. Still, the viewing experience is great thanks to DirectX effects.
Pros:
very fast
the best animation and page transition effects of all (powered by DirectX)
opens uncompressed image files
advanced hotkeys
good file browser with thumbnails as overlay
nice seekbar
page textures
plays video files
Cons:
Can't force displaying new images in original size (always fits)
HoneyView3 - freeware, Korean image/comic viewer. Nothing to be particularly
delighted about, but solid software. What should work, works steady and fast.
Pros:
skinable
uncompressed image viewer
quite fast
remembers reading position
opens next file/folder
Cons:
can't set two page mode + original size at once
limited hotkeys
Internet Explorer script error?
poor thumbnail mode
[strike]unable to get rid of toolbar in fullscreen[/strike] doable
no built-in file browser
Version used: 3.0.0.1 (May 2009), Bulid 5356 (15.04.2010)
Imagine:
Not a dedicated comic viewing software but standard image viewer that's able to read archives thanks to plugins. It's Korean one man project. It's extremely fast and lightweight. Beats IrfanView in every way, IMO. It works great as a file lister in Total Commander. I recommend it as a default image viewer for everyone that prefers speed over richness of features ( if you're in the second group give XnView a try).
Pros:
very fast
universal image viewer
Cons:
no scrolling to the next page (left click instead)
no two page mode
"I don't want to implement comic-viewer specific features" - author
Leeyes:
Japanese software dedicated for digital manga fans. It's fast and pretty rich with features every comic viewer should have. The main drawback is only partial, fan-made English localization. So unless you know a little of Japanese, some options may remind a mystery.
Pros:
detachable viewer from browser (useful with two monitors)
Google Translate: http://translate.google.com/translate?js=y&prev=_t&hl=pl&ie=UTF-8&layout=1&eotf=1&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww3.tokai.or.jp%2Fboxes%2Fleeyes%2F&sl=ja&tl=en
Patched with English Translation: http://www.mydailymanga.com/2008/06/21/manga-reading-tool/#comment-6802
LongBox:
It's commercial platform that attempts selling digital comics. No just reader but store and library together. LongBox made it to this list because latest public version allows users to import their cbz comics from outside the store. If you're not satisfied with it, you may want to give Graphic.ly a try, which follows the same philosophy (IMO, it's better product at this time).
Pros:
well, a store to buy legal comics
the fact that Library exist
Bookmarks
Skins
Cons:
poor stock number available to buy
the fact that Library has close to zero functionality
Worst reader ever. No fitting modes, zoom, not even scrolling. It's miracle it can display two pages and has manga mode.
crashed on me (but that is to be expected from beta version)
proprietary format - can't read bought comics outside LongBox ecosystem.
Manga Reader:
Interesting interface (same feel like CoView) and built-in OneManga scrapper is what stands out in this otherwise below average software.
Pros:
OneManga Support (download & read)
page animation
interactive zoom mode
Cons:
CBR problems reported
limited mouse control (can't scroll to the next page)
MangaMeeya:
Japanese viewer rather well known among manga fans, that gained a lot of crowd thanks to its speed and great number of features it provides. Only fan-made translation is available and sadly project is no longer maintained. Note: There is other version of this program called MangaMeeyaCE, also worth trying. Slightly less complicated. Better if you don't want to configure too much.
Pros:
very fast
archives within archives
almost everything is customizable (menus, toolbars, shortcuts...)
two monitors support (split window)
thumbnails of files and pages
mouse gestures
tabs
also opens uncompressed images
continuous display
toolbars/panels autohiding
Cons:
occasional bugs, hangs and crashes
configuration may seem a bit difficult (changing hotkeys)
dead since 2006, available only thanks to third-party providers
PicWalker:
Old program that I ran into when I first started looking for CDisplay alternative. It holds well even today. I think it's in the same tier as CDislay. Little more features, yet simple and fast.
Pros:
fast
continuous modes (vertical and horizontal)
built-in file browser
remembers last read position (+folder history)
docking panels and toolbars
Cons:
old
no two page mode
toolbars won't hide automatically in fullscreen
Version used: 4.2 (Sept 2004)
Links:
Original site dead. http://web.archive.org/web/20071016044309/www.oma-penny.com/software.php#PicWalker
I dedicate this list to all those people extracting archives with their comics and reading via Windows Picture Viewer / Photo Gallery, totally unaware of wide world of comic viewers. :)
If you think I missed program that's worth mentioning here or made some errors, let me know. If you disagree with my personal rating, feel free to comment and share your opinion.
( In the original thread:
http://comicrack.cyolito.com/user-forum/7-general/7148-list-of-comic-and-manga-readers )
B)
...and a description of Comic Rack by yours truly
Comic Rack:
A very feature rich comic viewer with massive library functions, ever since I've made the switch I can't imagine going back. The interface is a tad daunting at first look, since it can do so much, but once you get its hang you'll actually use the features a lot.
Pros:
Auto Page-Rotation
Two-Page Mode
Manga Mode (Right-to-Left)
Fitting Modes (and Zoom)
Continuous Reading Mode
Tab Support in Interface
Remembers Opened Books and last Position, Tracks Read/Unread Comics in Library
Doesn't use Proprietary Format, comic formats (cbr, cbz, etc.) remain compatible with other readers even when Library data (an xml file) is added to them.
Very Strong Library Features
Can Synchronize Library with ComicRack for Android
Network Share Features
Python Scripting Support
...more than I care to add now. :D
Cons:
Slow to load (though can be sent to notification area).
No support for raw image formats (jpg, png, etc.), comic/manga must be in a compressed (zip, rar, etc.) or comic-book (cbr, cbz) format.
Feature-Rich Interface can be overwhelming to new users.
The site can't live without advertisement, so things related to that likely won't change.
However an advertiser acting as a virus/trojan vector is another thing altogether. Please send a log of what the infection was (and any other logs of your anti-virus software on what object caused the infection) to Jacob as this is *exactly* the kind of issue we want to avoid subjecting our users to.
It's interesting though, that many of these wealthy, honest, entrepreneurs like bill gates actually support tax increases for the top 1 % or super wealthy that control 90% of the wealth.
Not that weird, when you got more money than you can possibly spend, and have no idea what to do with, why not put it to good use? People are sometimes nicer than you'd think.
So why don't these people actually put their money to good use? Why do they ask the government to take everyone else down with them? :S
Also, isn't Bill Gates a Bilderberger and large investor in Monsanto? With all that considered, there is probably some other motive for wanting more "tax".
Actually, when talking about Bill Gates one can put into consideration that he alone does about as much to help underdeveloped countries and places stricken by disease and starvation as many major organizations. The three biggest fnanical aids are UNICEF, msf, and the. Gates family. Many of the very,very rich families hang on to their money like a Jewish bankman, but there's also a Ltd of generous and helpful ones.
To me, taxing the rich more than the average joe may make sense, but it's still pretty unfair. Taxes are precentage based, so they automatically pay more to begin with, why make them pay even more? Really?
1) Because right now, the rich pay less, as a percentage of their income, then middle-class. Que Warren Buffet pointing out, that his secretary pays more then he does. (This is because the rich/super-rich earn most of their money not as wage, but as dividends).
2) Because a flat-tax rate is abhorrently unfair, for the simple reason that a loaf of bread costs the same for everyone, rich or poor. There's a fixed cost of living. You have to eat. You need shelter. You need water. These things are not negotiable and there's a price you pay for them.
In America add health-care, mortgage and student debt costs or petrol (try and live without a car in America and you're in for a nasty surprise!) and you'll quickly realize, you can't lay the same tax on the poor as the rich when they're already under so much burden.
3) Let's not forget the *regressive* parts of taxation, like payroll tax (not the same as income! This is your contribution to medicare and your pension) or sales taxes! The later is directly tied into consumption, and when added up once again shows that the poor pay a lot *bigger* portion of their income as tax than what the IRS statistics (tracking *only* income tax) would lead you to believe.
I personally think the rich people shouldnt have to pay more taxes for 1. it just goes to welfare to people who dont even try to get a job just want to live off of it and make more children so they can put it in there names and earn more and more 2. some of the rich people dont work hard I will agree there but thats because the do investments which means they had to study and do good in school or college etc. now if i were paying more taxes I would only not mind paying more if it was to a person who needs food and is trying to get better in life like charity but thats what charity is for. All in all it doesnt matter I just wish we didnt have to pay more taxes are goverment is allready in debt to china no point not like the little money from all the taxes will make this place better lol.
Are you really this deluded? Did you actually look at what state/federal budgets are made of? It's rich libertards like you who do the work for the super-rich and prevent common folk from earning a decent wage for their toils.
1) Taxes pay for police, fire-fighters, hospitals, roads, bridges, defense (military), consumer & environmental protection agencies, libraries... and yes, welfare. (As well as foreign aid, university R&D, etc., etc.)
2) The rich are busy sucking the government teat, while they preach austerity for the rest of us, they get handouts in the forms of subsidies. I'm all for stopping the *REAL* government handouts... which are NOT welfare, but WEALTH-FARE for these fucks.
3) Charity *CAN'T* work. Look at no.1. Those are all areas of life where we found through hard experience that capitalism doesn't work. Charity can't discharge all the obligations I've outlined.
Charity doesn't have the oversight, know-how or the resources to affect the real problems afflicting our societies. Government can, and while it *CAN* be co-opted and corrupted, it still remains a necessary institution.
Most importantly, charity can't enforce any form of justice.
There used to be a time when people understood that our society was based upon Social Contract, that we had obligations to one-another as citizens. The government is the elected body that discharges these duties on our behalf and maintains our freedom.
Any and all short comings of government, are in the end, the shortcomings of the populace itself, for without its consent, without its complicity corruption and negligence wouldn't be possible...
...which has. The general populace has allowed all of that to happen, then we "blame THE MAN", we blame politicians, we blame the rich, we blame anyone but who's primarily responsible: ourselves.
We allowed the rich to displace us as the real policy makers of our nations (one could do worse than read up on Chomsky's thoughts on this matter). Unless the people take back, what's theirs by the Constitution and natural right, things won't ever get better.
Get the rich out of politics! Our governments are so corrupted *BECAUSE* the rich can throw around all that money and *BUY* our officials for spare change.
Make the rich once again accountable! Have Wall Street criminals prosecuted for their crimes!
VOTE! Speak up! Politicize! Unless you take it back, the power over you will forever be vested in others!
Inequality hurts nations. No, I'm not talking about failure to comply with communist visions of society. I'm talking about this:
While the economy was growing and expanding, the wages of the common worker were falling... and not just blue-collar worker's! Everyone, but the top 20% (management) came out worse for it.
I would only reccomend using SVP if you have a capable GPU (Although most are) because it can be pretty slow without OpenCL if you don't have a higher-end CPU.
And flaser,
One is not 'woefully naive' because they hope for improvement, it might not be of use to you but it is to many.
Feel free to call me naive after you have actually used this because I quite literally see a drastic improvement, if you already have then fair enough, it isn't of use to you.
I'm not badmouthing the filter, all I'm saying is that it won't do *anything* for people who're suffering from stutter during playback caused by insufficient CPU/GPU power.
Nice, will download. Tired of having my high qualities lagging when their running.
Once again: this *doesn't* help with frame stuttering! If you have rendering problems with the video not rendering at its proper 23-25 fps rate, *this* won't solve that.
If you don't have the processing power to render "unenhanced" video, then you won't have it for "smoothed" either.
If you're suffering from frame-lag, this would make it *worse* as it exponentially increases the computational needs of rendering video.
All it does, is interpolate between the frames in the sources, in essence creating motion blur. Whether its look and feel is worth the cost is up for interpretation, but hoping for any drastic improvement is woefully naive.
I believe the issue here was to mitigate perception of video lag caused by monitor refresh rates, not actual frame lag due to insufficient hardware.
That you can't help any way. Either the hardware is up to the task, or it isn't. However that's, not the case here.
All in all, the whole issue is another marketing "gimmick", as most video sources have a frame-rate of 24~25 FPS. Yeah, all the movies, in fact that "movie look" is created by the low frame-rate. PAL is broadcast as 50 FPS interleaved, which means it's progressive equivalent is 25 FPS. The same is true for NTSC at 60 FPS interleaved, translating to 30 FPS progressive.
Since most TFT monitors have refresh rates of 60 & 75 Hz, they're more than capable of displaying any broadcast or movie content... by a magnitude of two.
In the future, true 50/60 FPS progressive sources may show up, but even then PC peripheries should handle that just fine.
If you're suffering from frame-lag, this would make it *worse* as it exponentially increases the computational needs of rendering video.
All it does, is interpolate between the frames in the sources, in essence creating motion blur. Whether its look and feel is worth the cost is up for interpretation, but hoping for any drastic improvement is woefully naive.