Kaimax wrote...
pendragon9123 wrote...
Kaimax wrote...
Then to be fair, which studio "is better" at making their own original story, and
why CLAMP is not the best choice?
CLAMP's adaptation of Saya's adventure in the Blood universe will be compared to Blood + just as quickly as FMA Brotherhood was to the original. and when comparing CLAMP's adaptation to Blood + or even Blood: The Last Vampire it does not have some of the same quality's that made me enjoy its predecessors. Until they can show me something just as good or better i will not be happy with it.
You still haven't answered my question.
and FMA of course got compared because it's still the same series, one was prematurely ended, one was a complete adaptation
Elaborate
quality
It's clear that you're biased by preference and you're clearly ignoring CLAMP's history of story-making.
Honestly trying to compare Blood+ and Blood-C is like comparing an Apple with a Pear. The insides looks the same but it's an entirely
different fruit.
Are you saying that i should throw out all the opinions of Blood shows that i have seen? Why? Fan's of Blood: The Last Vampire liked Blood + because it had the same kind of action and art. The story telling was an added plus. With CLAMP's Blood C I expect all three of these points at least.
Don't think that i dislike ClAMP. i love some of their shows especially because of the story telling however CLAMP's art is very distinctive and I don't think it fits with the previous blood show's and their more realistic feel.
To answer your question i think that Bones would be a better studio. The show i specifically point to is Darker than Black. Darker than Black has superb story telling and the art is very realistic.
Over all Blood + and Blood C should not be like comparing apples to pears. it should be more like comparing a Granny Smith apple to a Red Delicious apple. If Blood C does end up being more like a pear to an apple then me and many others will be sorely disappointed.