opanihuya wrote...
"Did they go all schizophrenic?" A first, in the sense you mean it, but that's what ctfg is for.
"Did they harass people over PMs?" Idk.
"Did they tell everyone to go fuck themselves?" Yes, one of em, that was the reason for ban.
That's fucked, as much as people dislike ctfg, calling it for the place of schizophrenics is uncalled for and unjustified.
opanihuya wrote...
Ok ok we already know this by now, this stuff lasts for who knows how long. But if it was only for that, would waar make this thread?
He was asking for our opinion. And most said no. End of story.
opanihuya wrote...
Probably yes but jacob isn't against it and that has got to mean something. I kinda like that the staff allows us to debate their decisions and that jacob's opinion could be ignored (?!) but if it was all already set in stone because of the things you pointed out, then why are we still talking?
Again, the staff didn't ask us to find reasons for Koko to be allowed to come back. Waar specifically asked whether we should let Koko back, and most of us said no.
opanihuya wrote...
Isn't it because she's so persistent that it compliments the site's creator? I don't know where I'm going with this but if waar's decision depended only on koko's history, it wouldn't be open to debate. After all, wasn't this thread made in hopes to find something that could be accounted in her favor.
Well, as I said before, that will set a bad precedent. If the staff decides to let koko come back, everyone can just make 100 alts just to be able to come back after getting perma-banned, because if they can't, they're getting an unfair treatment.
This thread was made by Waar (ignoring yet another rules broken by Koko) to "ponder what we should do". He didn't specifically said we should give some sympathy, or support her so she can come back. Therefore, everyone here is entitled to what they said.