Here's what I wanted to post, this is straight out of my moms text book for psychology:
Problems with the stars:
Astrology is probably the most popular pseudopsychology. Astrology holds that the positions of the stars and planets at the time of one's birth determine personality traits and affect behavior. Like other pseudopsychologies, astrology has repeatedly been shown to have no scientific validity. (Kelly, 1998, 1997; Stewart, 1996). The objections to astrology are numerous and devastating.
[list]1. The zodiac has shifted in the sky by one full constellation since astrology was first set up. However, most astrologers simply ignore this shift. (In other words, if astrology calls you a Scorpio you are really a Libra, and so forth.)
2.There is no connection between the "compatibility" of couples' astrological signs and their marriage and divorce rates.
3. Studies have found no connection between astrological signs and leadership, physical characteristics, career choices, or personality traits.
4. Astrologers have failed to explain why the moment of birth should be more important than the moment of conception.
5. A study of more then 3,000 predictions by famous astrologers found that only a small percentage were fulfilled. These "Successful" predictions tended to be vague ("There will be a tragedy somewhere in the east in the spring") or easily guessed from current events.
6. If astrologers are asked to match people with their horoscopes, they do no better than would be expected by chance (Kelly, 1999).
7. A few astrologers have tried to test astrology. Their results have been just as negative as those obtained by critics. (Sources: Kelly, 1998, 1999; Martens & Trachet, 1998; Stewart, 1996.)[/list:u]
In short, astrology doesn't work.
Then why does astrology often seem to work? The following discussion tells why.
Uncritical Acceptance:
If you have ever had your astrological chart done, you may have been impressed with its apparent accuracy. However, such perceptions are typically based on uncritical acceptance (the tendency to believe positive or flattering descriptions of yourself.) Many astrological charts are made up of mostly flattering traits. Naturally, when your personality is described in desirable terms, it is hard to deny that the description has the "ring of truth." How much acceptance would astrology receive if a birth sign read like this:
Virgo: You are a logical type and hate disorder. Your nitpicking is unbearable to your friends. You are cold, unemotional, and usually fall asleep while making love. Virgos make good doorsteps.
And just for shits and giggles I got out my moms "The only Astrology book you'll ever need"
Let's take a look at compatibility shall we?
We'll do Moses and I since he doesn't really know about his Capricorn likeness. (Neither do I really)
Capricorn and Pisces:
Capricorn provides a ballast for Pisces's drifting dreaminess and supplies the stability that Pisces needs and admires. And there's nothing Capricorn likes better than being admired. Capricorn is the boudoir captain, but Pisces is a willing crew. Pisces's taste for the bizarre may even influence Capricorn's conventional passions. Pisces's generous affections and Capricorn's strong sense of loyalty combine to make each feel safe and protected. These very different people meet each other's needs.
:roll: The stability that I need. Woohoo. Nothx, I'm good being single, but hey least we know now that we're compatible.