cruz737 wrote...
I can see a group think system working really well for music, and maybe films. Having multiple staff members take the time to digest a game, and then write a review might be more time consuming, and unfortunately well timed reviews (and content being released regularly) are a huge part of the industry. I've only seen Polygon do this sort of thing, and even then only for some reviews.
Personally I wouldn't mind delayed reviews that don't come out the day of or before release date, with an in-depth examination of various aspects of games. More of
this guy. Actually a lot more that guy but with scheduled updates.
I was thinking for the creation of works themselves, but reviews are like any other content when placed on the internet. The important part, I think, is joint control over any enterprise. Even if the choice of material is dictated by somebody else, as in a news outlet, peer review of the essays themselves would bring more well thought out commentary to the community---and do better to advance the art.