animefreak_usa wrote...
True the ad people have the right to say 'well we at The SPCA don't want our ads on the filthy frank show or the hunting channels', but it doesn't seem the advertisers are the one in control of what and where the ads are on. It seems youtube bots are the ones running the show of where to put the tide commercial or where nationwide is gonna show up on. Plus those terms of condition is vague as fuck. Plus youtube need content and the content makers at large may just say fuck it and if im not gonna make money doing what i do and got so many views and subs... why do it.
Now i seeing a new thing coming since youtube red is now a thing.... monthly subs for those who want freedom of content restrictions. Which i think most of red's content to be shite, but then again the majority of youtube videos are shit. Few people made good shit and it mostly lets game and tech stuff with a few people who are funny and making some watchable. Papa frank is a shit, but at least he entertaining for awhile.
All of you youtube red is probably suitable for all ages. I don't think they would partner with people who blog about things like the Stanford Rape case/Isreal and the middle East/etc. etc.
As for the bots, it's easier for them that way. Youtube is one of the most visited sites that has a great deal of content, and going through all of it at once with humans isn't possible. So some of the ad companies and google just made guidelines for the bots to follow, just like they did with copyright bots. Maybe actual people will review some of the flagged content, case by case but I'm not holding my breathe. Youtube has gotten better in that regards when it comes to copyright. (i.e SuperBunnyHop and his Kojima/Konami video)