Drifter995 wrote...
Aud1o Blood wrote...
It's a legitimate phenomenon. News agencies sensationalize things like this when there is nothing comfortable to comment on. The truth is, clicktivism means nothing unless it effects an issue the party in question is already anticipating getting flack about.
Because Target fears a war on women narrative, it pulled the game.
Because Target does not fear fundamentalist atheists, nothing will happen.
(Nothing happening is a non-story)
You can't say for certain that nothing will happen. What makes you think women won't get on this, and threaten a war on women narrative?
Also, considering one actually promotes the ideals that gta was falsely banned for, they would have to follow through with it. Otherwise they are being hypocrites
That would be a valid line, but you are assuming that the store cares about being hypocritical. GTA is a fundamentally different product from The Bible because of the cultural baggage it carries, therefore the result of these comparable petitions will differ on a fundamental level.
And, Freaky, the counter petition is an idea, but I think that the reasoning it claims are too....logical fallacy--ey.
Identifying feminists as the cause, rather than the idea that art has to serve society rather than challenge it, amounts to a scapegoating tactic that will invalidate the entire effort. If they wanted to keep the game on shelves, they should use arguments based on precedent and profit. Simply screaming that the wimmunz are coming for your gemmz sounds childish and reinforces the misogynistic stereotype people are trying to link the game to.
Think of it like when a Black person calls a white co-worker on a race tinged assumption, and the white man goes full retard---trying to find instances of "reverse racism"---instead of acknowledging the misunderstanding and straightening out the conflict between perception and fact.