cruz737 wrote...
Gravity cat wrote...
British people in their usual racist ways are blindly blaming Muslims and Syrian refugees even though they are/have been victims of terrorism themselves.
Nothing unusual there.
Hasn't been confirmed that they were "refugees" who did it for Isis and Syria?
I'm 100% certain that ISIS already claimed responsibility and that they kept true to their promise, that they'd use the mass migration to their advantage.
http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/latest-france-mobilizes-1500-soldiers-35200087
An employee at Greece's Ministry of Citizen Protection says Greek police have sent the fingerprints of the owner of the Syrian passport found at one of Friday's attacks in Paris to French police.
Go ahead and call me racist but I don't think Islamic/Muslim culture (it's a religion, not a race, m8) goes well with modern western (European) culture as a whole, if they are to take in more "refugees" should be more cautious and restrictive. A lot of these people are not seeking to reciprocate kindness, empathy and respect. They're quite pissed at western intervention (rightfully so in many cases),secularism and a bunch of ridiculous shit.
You're right ISIS did claim responsibility, but I was more referring to the fact most people I see posting about the issue make no effort to do research outside of sharing propaganda from right-wing groups. Probably should have made that clearer.
On one hand it's fine to be cautious, on the other you shouldn't outright discriminate against everyone that is fleeing a country that is practically a warzone on the grounds that it contains a terrorist group with an agenda that attacks civilians in various countries (including their own) to make a point. Those fleeing are either trying to get away from the terrorist group or from our bombs.
I still don't fully understand why we bombed them.
(it's a religion, not a race, m8)
Where did you get the idea I thought it was a race?