When what could be seen of John was a lump in his mother's abdomen, and when his head was splitting open the cervix of his poor mother, and when his body is shoving aside the pelvic bones, and when his poor mother was suffering from conditions symptomatic of someone in labour, John's mother was in incredible pain and agony.
It is in times like these, one’s thoughts go back into the past in search for the answer to these questions: “What did I do to land myself in this situation? What have I done wrong? How do I avoid being in such a situation in the future?” The same goes for John’s mother. Here are her answers to those questions:
What did I do to land myself in this situation?
My husband and I tried for a baby. It worked.
What have I done wrong?
My husband and I tried for a baby. It worked.
How do I avoid being in such a situation in the future?
We should not try for a baby in the future.
These thoughts appear to be simple but have profound consequences. Apart from the obvious ones like John doomed to not having any younger brother or sister and John being subject to rather nasty physical abuse when he asked rather innocently to his mother why he doesn’t have a younger brother or sister, it had most of all his mother’s beliefs of what is right and what is wrong. It was wrong of her to try for a baby and right for her not to try for a baby.
Did the harrowing experience of childbirth change her beliefs pertaining to morality?
Not really! (Insert meretricious smiley)
Though it must be said that what John’s mother experienced is quite similar to behaviour conditioning. (As its name implies, behaviour conditioning is the process where one is made to behave in a certain way.) Childbirth was so traumatic to John’s mother that she swore not to undergo it again. Her behaviour can be said to be conditioned by childbirth. One’s morality is conditioned as well, as John’s life story should show.
His first few years, just like any other infant’s, presented him a steep learning curve he had to surmount. After all, he was not born into this world knowing everything about how to conduct himself in the civilised world. Providence did endow him with the faculties needed to learn, namely am inquisitive and easily impressed mind, ever ready to experiment and try new things. The problem is however, inquisitive minds do not lead to civilised behaviour, quite the contrary. As it is too unsettling to recount in detail the mischief a stupid, ill-bred and mindless brat, we will settle for a limerick to detail what John did for most of his first few years.
Infant John made a mess
Of his food on the desk
He crawled up high places, here and there
And gave his mother quite a good scare
This looked bad, so it seemed
But made much worse
With Infant John’s screams
His poor mother was thus in no good mood
And she spanked and spanked and spanked and spanked
Infant John till he was good
It was in these formative years, John learnt (rather painfully) what was right and what was wrong. It all boiled down to this: Do wrong and you will be spanked horribly. Do right and you will not be spanked horribly. Sense was beaten into him. Civility was beaten into him. Indeed, morality was beaten to him.
That appeared to be clear cut and easy to comprehend. Yet, his struggled in the next few years of his life on issues pertaining to right and wrong. While it is easy to conclude that a deed is right or moral after it is done, it isn’t the case before the deed is performed. Take for example that episode in John’s childhood when he attempted his very first mural with crayons and colour pencils at his poor mother’s bedroom. John then must have thought his first masterpiece possessing much aesthetic value. However, his mother (and indeed anyone else who beheld the mess he made on the walls in his mother’s bedroom) was not of that opinion and begun manhandling him with powerful blows to his bottom.
Imagine how perplexed John must have felt then when his masterpiece garnered such a reception from his mother. How was he to know that his mother hated mural paintings especially if it was done in her bedroom? This episode was not without consequence. John †˜knew’ that mural painting is wrong and so is an interest in the fine arts. Refraining from such activity on the other hand was right. Because it is difficult to know if a deed say scrawling on the walls with crayons is wrong, John’s morality was shaped by a painful process of trial and error.
This continued as he grew older where he was punished for doing bad and not really rewarded for doing good or not doing wrong. There was a difference though. The seriousness of and the number of the decisions he had to make grew along with his age. The outcome of a single decision made when he was in his teenage years like the amount of time he was to spend in his studies had more profound consequences compared to his first and final attempt at mural painting. Long and tortuous explanations aside, the following briefly lists some of John’s exploits in his prepubescence and pubescence:
1. Imitated what he saw in television to gain attention. It was a cartoon character who like all cartoon characters can’t speak normally. Received unwanted attention and was made fun of and beaten. Learnt that imitating what the television shows is wrong and not imitating television shows is right.
2. Played truant one day because he felt like it. Received a severe tongue lashing from his teacher and was beaten. Learnt that playing truant is wrong and not playing truant is right.
3. Picked up a stray kitten on his way home. Mauled by the kitten’s mother and was bitten. A nasty infection took place. Learnt that picking up stray kittens is wrong and displaying a dislike for kittens, cats and anything feline-shaped is right.
4. Rubbed some part of his own body. Felt very, very good. Learnt that not rubbing that part of his own body is wrong and rubbing it is right.
Although these are all experiences of a healthy young males and some of us, perhaps more advanced in years would find them juvenile and silly (and creepy). Indeed, if John were made to look back into his past, he would be of the same opinion too. Nonetheless, these life experiences, trivial (and creepy) they may be, shaped John’s views on what is right or wrong.
Then there came a point in his life where that simple formula in determining what is right and is wrong was put into question. It concerns procreation and John’s progeny. John’s experience with courting women went like this:
- Had a relationship with a young woman. The relationship didn’t go well. Learnt that having relationships is wrong and not having relationships is right.
He thought he would remain single for good but for the intervention of his mother. His relationship with can be summed up like this:
- John went against his mother’s wishes. He almost landed himself in hospital. Learnt that going against his mother is wrong and listening to her is right.
This presents an apparent dilemma but John found it easy to resolve. This was how he did it:
- Having a relationship is wrong because things will not go well.
- Going against my mother’s wishes is worse because I might land myself in hospital.
- Since having a relationship is less ruinous compared to going against my mother’s wishes, I think I am going to have a relationship after all.
And so he found himself betrothed to a rather charming young lady around his age, who under pressure from both their mothers tied the knot, settled down and tried to live happily after. Little did he know at that time that far from having a happy ending, a new chapter of the story of life was beginning to unfold. However, John’s life were to be a story, that story might be a horror story. It certainly would make a horrible entry to some writing event conducted on a forum of pornographic website.
To do justice to how his married life was, and it was one that would continue until he drew his last breath, would require another long entry that ought to be left for another time. Yet, it is still possible to list the highlights of his married life that lead him once more to question if a deed is right or wrong and shape his idea on is moral and what isn’t. Here is once more a list:
a. The night when he consummated his marriage. John remembered feeling good. For some reason he never asked his spouse if she felt the same. If it felt good, it must be good or moral!
b. The night when his spouse went into labour in scenes so reminiscent of what his mother had to go through a long time ago. John remembered it not feeling good. For some reason, he also never asked his spouse if she felt the same. If childbirth didn’t feel good, it must be not be good or moral!
c. The night when he had to put up with his young daughter’s inane and eardrum piercing screaming. John remembered it not feeling good. For some reason, he also never asked his spouse if she felt the same. If having to put up with having a daughter didn’t feel good, then it must be not be good or moral!
d. The night when he decided to deal with his young daughter’s inane and eardrum piercing screaming by giving her a good thumping on the bottom. The screaming was replaced by bawling which sounded less inane and not so ear piercing though it was loud. If beating your daughter when she does an inane and eardrum piercing scream feel good, then it must be good or moral. (He never told his spouse what he had done to their daughter by the way.)
Readers at this juncture might have found that John’s story was, putting aside the lazy and repetitive writing, indeed filled with repetitions. Another generation underwent the same treatment and with it the same thought processes. In other words, John’s daughter was to become as nutty as John himself. Leaving aside the fact that she would never have the (mis)fortune to have siblings younger than her, she would inherit from his father the way to determine right from wrong.