cruz737 wrote...
I disagree.
Well since you said "
if it's established" then you've probably entertained the idea that it's not a classmate that pushed her into traffic but I'd rather hold on that thought for now. So I'll assume that it was one of the bullies.
The problem is they haven't given concrete proof of her powerlessness, only implied it from her side(which is obviously colored). Granted it's only two chapters in but somewhere down the line they need to show why she's powerless. Without evidence, I'm going to assume she handled this poorly if at all(with the reverse true). It's entirely possible that despite the tormentor's degree of maliciousness and cunning, she COULD have found a way out. I would have to see the degree of the tormentor's previous actions myself. This conversation feels a bit premature.
Ayana is being selfish
I'm not saying Ayana is being selfish for asking for help, I'm saying it's wrong for Ayana to seek vengeance on Takeshima (although the manga could make that interesting). Yes Takeshima did treat her like crap(while being under the weather) but Ayana still could have approached her in the future(maybe she did but it didn't go well? Show evidence). Regardless, a cut relationship is not grounds for ruining Takeshima's relations with her parents and society. Friends can forgive(and will as Takeshima showed) but what Ayana has done will scar Takeshima. Both parties were at fault there: Takeshima for honoring her promise to neglect Ayana and Ayana for not being compassionate when it mattered in the past and present.
didn't do much for previous harassment sessions
They already said Takeshima had a decent reason for neglecting Ayana that
one time. She's got ALOT on her hands and while it's terrible that her friend was neglected as a result, it's far-fetched to say she didn't do much in the past when she comforted Ayana.
What about Ayana choosing not to make peace with Takeshima? I'm interested in you addressing that.
Even if she knew her parents were not only strict but possibly abusive, what they do isn't controlled by her.
If I threw a man wearing a coat of meat into a feral lion pit, I would not be innocent. Ayana set up the situation knowing full well that the consequences would cause suffering worthy of the pain she's felt. Regardless of the outcome, she meant harm.
It's not fair to say that one person should be in control of not being physically assaulted but then that we should be sympathetic to someone who couldn't stand up to her parents.
Well I mourn the victims and guilty in this case. I prefer not to speak for others.
I'm just confused as to why people are okie dokie with the first revenge but shocked at the 2nd one. They're very similar in concept. It's just that one person is a lot less terrible than the other.
Well it's person not people(I don't think anything in this is fine). You said it yourself, she's kinder than the previous victim. Takeshima was also not directly involved nor showed intention to bully Ayana. In moral standing, details and extenuating circumstances are incredibly important. I'll also blame the infectious white and black attitudes toward cheating for coloring people's judgement of the first victim.
I might be saying this prematurely, but I feel as though Ayana is supposed to be an antihero. Her actions are meant to offend the viewer but to what ends or effectiveness remains to be seen.