Waar-chan! Waar-chan!

I can do better.



Anyone that agrees with me/what I'm doing is sucking my dick now? Does that mean people can claim you're a white knight now? Not quite a fair claim is it? You get that the majority of the forum was against her before I knew she existed right?

Tegumi I'm sorry but you're not crazy enough for my likes. Thus disregarded.



_b


First, I would like to say that anti-mage is not anyone. He's a person and an individual. That he likes supporting your manhood with his mouth is stuff of legend and was present long before koko broke out of ctfg. So please don't generalize.

Your understanding of my position is appreciated. Yup I get that, only i don't agree with your definition of majority. I'd agree on 2/5 though. You're only doing your job, I'm pretty much adapted to it. It's the sense of camaraderie that's being used to hunt down koko I'm laughing up.

Lol, this reminds me of

While this was both a jab and an observation, it was more of the latter rather than the former.
Your protests just always seem very unprincipled, is all. It's like you do it for the sake of doing it rather than for any good reason.

I'm not wrong.



So this is simply against anti-mage, had anyone else said something negative about koko you wouldn't feel the need to accuse them of being my nut hugger? Honestly? Also what does that have to do with this situation then, why did you bother bringing it up if it's not relevant to this case? Mage clearly isn't a fan of her so his support of my position has little/nothing to do with his past approval of my actions. You're using the fact that he supported me in the past to invalidate his (very valid) opinion. I assume you're not a stupid person, I hope you can see the flaw in your statement, don't make me regret my assumption.

While the number of people who support this action is up for debate the fact that I am required to do it this way is not, I can't be everywhere and her use of alts clearly requires more supervision than any one person can give. We've debated this already, and you can't deny her actions are damning, rules have been violated and she has shown a continued disregard for any form of authority(myself and Jacob). So if this course of action is a problem, then suggest another way to deal with this(She won't be given another chance, don't ask for it).

In opanihuya's defense, Anti-mage is a pretty big faggot. :^)

Doesn't mean he's wrong.

Nah, I approve. either that or captain obvious.



lol nut hugger

Mmm your expectations (assumptions?) are wasted on me. I use different approaches for different folks.
Also, he doesn't support you anymore? The lack of evidence is unconvincing.
As for the very valid opinion: Rights in our cases is a controversial subject so I'll pass. Despise for stupidity? K, don't share that.



The way I see it (and i understand how you see it) is that ib is a special place where alts and unlawful behavior is entertaining. You're fun police, she's crazy and the audience can be manipulated towards law or chaos. Users are not mods so their initiative for snitching comes from influence. As does their abstinence from it.

Unlike illumina koko was really a part of this community, for 4 years. People can understand her persistence. I share this understanding. Sorry waar, I woun't be helping the fun police on this one.

p.s.


you're clingy

I never said anything about whether he supported me or not, I simply stated it has nothing to do with his opinion in this matter, he didn't say what he said because of his support for me, he disliked her long before I got involved. His opinion was that she was stupid and had no right to be here, we cant gauge her intelligence thought I have my suspicions but her right to be here has officially been revoked. You can't argue against it and to simply chime in and call it "I<3canadian penis" is a very poor argument and makes you look childish.



I didn't have to manipulate the community, the members who are reporting her are people who were against her to start. The fact that others have spoken up recently is based on her actions alone(make multiple accounts and "look at me" threads). My "influence" isn't whats making them report her, they actually want her to leave(those that dislike her) and I'm more that happy to oblige as it is my job now.

I don't blame her for wanting to be here, it's hard to leave. Which is why I would never think of appealing to her, asking her to leave. I am simply giving her the fight she has asked for. I want you to understand, she was given a second chance, and my support before that, I just don't have anything else to offer her now. I'm also not asking you to report her. You don't like my policy or the way I handle things? Give me a better idea, otherwise it looks like your complaining is just mindless butthurt over something unrelated(Tegumi is correct, that is what this looks like).

p.s. Alts are not permitted in IB, we simply have to have proof before we can ban people for it. "I think that's an alt" isn't enough.

Ok I feel you, his love for canadian penis may be unrelated to this situation.



Man have you ever felt that vn stuff, where you're ok with both chicks, only instead of one chick it's fakku staff? I don't have any ideas man. What I know is that things aren't black and white and that even your judgement can be influenced. I just lack in speechcraft.

fuck this took long enough

It's not an easy situation to resolve, so we do the best we can. I think I treated this as a grey area as long as I could, backing her up at times, giving her a second chance. 4 years don't give her the right to send harassing pm's to another users(who has also been here a while). I never claimed koko was the only one at fault, but she is the person who pushed too far. If you do think of a valid argument or solution please feel free to bring it up any time, but just hating on the staff or trashing our method of handling things wont help anyone, and it makes you look like a grumpy asshole.

lol grumpy asshole

Unlikely I'll come up with something. Between man and man, it's not hating. It's going separate ways.

SO LIKE

I AM SAM. I AM SAM. SAM I AM.

THAT SAM-I-AM! THAT SAM-I-AM! I DO NOT LIKE THAT SAM-I-AM!

DO WOULD YOU LIKE GREEN EGGS AND HAM?

I DO NOT LIKE THEM,SAM-I-AM.
I DO NOT LIKE GREEN EGGS AND HAM.

WOULD YOU LIKE THEM HERE OR THERE?

I WOULD NOT LIKE THEM HERE OR THERE.
I WOULD NOT LIKE THEM ANYWHERE.
I DO NOT LIKE GREEN EGGS AND HAM.
I DO NOT LIKE THEM, SAM-I-AM.

WOULD YOU LIKE THEM IN A HOUSE?
WOULD YOU LIKE THEN WITH A MOUSE?

I DO NOT LIKE THEM IN A HOUSE.
I DO NOT LIKE THEM WITH A MOUSE.
I DO NOT LIKE THEM HERE OR THERE.
I DO NOT LIKE THEM ANYWHERE.
I DO NOT LIKE GREEN EGGS AND HAM.
I DO NOT LIKE THEM, SAM-I-AM.

WOULD YOU EAT THEM IN A BOX?
WOULD YOU EAT THEM WITH A FOX?

NOT IN A BOX. NOT WITH A FOX.
NOT IN A HOUSE. NOT WITH A MOUSE.
I WOULD NOT EAT THEM HERE OR THERE.
I WOULD NOT EAT THEM ANYWHERE.
I WOULD NOT EAT GREEN EGGS AND HAM.
I DO NOT LIKE THEM, SAM-I-AM.

WOULD YOU? COULD YOU? IN A CAR?
EAT THEM! EAT THEM! HERE THEY ARE.

I WOULD NOT, COULD NOT, IN A CAR.

YOU MAY LIKE THEM. YOU WILL SEE.
YOU MAY LIKE THEM IN A TREE!

I WOULD NOT, COULD NOT IN A TREE.
NOT IN A CAR! YOU LET ME BE.
I DO NOT LIKE THEM IN A BOX.
I DO NOT LIKE THEM WITH A FOX.
I DO NOT LIKE THEM IN A HOUSE.
I DO NOT LIKE THEM WITH A MOUSE.
I DO NOT LIKE THEM HERE OR THERE.
I DO NOT LIKE THEM ANYWHERE.
I DO NOT LIKE GREEN EGGS AND HAM.
I DO NOT LIKE THEM, SAM-I-AM.

A TRAIN! A TRAIN! A TRAIN! A TRAIN!
COULD YOU, WOULD YOU ON A TRAIN?

NOT ON TRAIN! NOT IN A TREE!
NOT IN A CAR! SAM! LET ME BE!
I WOULD NOT, COULD NOT, IN A BOX.
I WOULD NOT, COULD NOT, WITH A FOX.
I WILL NOT EAT THEM IN A HOUSE.
I WILL NOT EAT THEM HERE OR THERE.
I WILL NOT EAT THEM ANYWHERE.
I DO NOT EAT GREEM EGGS AND HAM.
I DO NOT LIKE THEM, SAM-I-AM.

SAY! IN THE DARK? HERE IN THE DARK!
WOULD YOU, COULD YOU, IN THE DARK?

I WOULD NOT, COULD NOT, IN THE DARK.

WOULD YOU COULD YOU IN THE RAIN?

I WOULD NOT, COULD NOT IN THE RAIN.
NOT IN THE DARK. NOT ON A TRAIN.
NOT IN A CAR. NOT IN A TREE.
I DO NOT LIKE THEM, SAM, YOU SEE.
NOT IN A HOUSE. NOT IN A BOX.
NOT WITH A MOUSE. NOT WITH A FOX.
I WILL NOT EAT THEM HERE OR THERE.
I DO NOT LIKE THEM ANYWHERE!

YOU DO NOT LIKE GREEN EGGS AND HAM?

I DO NOT LIKE THEM, SAM-I-AM.

COULD YOU, WOULD YOU, WITH A GOAT?

I WOULD NOT, COULD NOT WITH A GOAT!

WOULD YOU, COULD YOU, ON A BOAT?

I COULD NOT, WOULD NOT, ON A BOAT.
I WILL NOT, WILL NOT, WITH A GOAT.
I WILL NOT EAT THEM IN THE RAIN.
NOT IN THE DARK! NOT IN A TREE!
NOT IN A CAR! YOU LET ME BE!
I DO NOT LIKE THEM IN A BOX.
I DO NOT LIKE THEM WITH A FOX.
I WILL NOT EAT THEM IN A HOUSE.
I DO NOT LIKE THEM WITH A MOUSE.
I DO NOT LIKE THEM HERE OR THERE.
I DO NOT LIKE THEM ANYWHERE!
I DO NOT LIKE GREEN EGGS AND HAM!
I DO NOT LIKE THEM, SAM-I-AM.

YOU DO NOT LIKE THEM. SO YOU SAY.
TRY THEM! TRY THEM! AND YOU MAY.
TRY THEM AND YOU MAY, I SAY.

sAM! IF YOU LET ME BE,
I WILL TRY THEM. YOU WILL SEE.

(... and he tries them ...)

SAY! I LIKE GREEN EGGS AND HAM!
I DO! I LIKE THEM, SAM-I-AM!
AND I WOULD EAT THEM IN A BOAT.
AND I WOULD EAT THEM WITH A GOAT...
AND I WILL EAT THEM, IN THE RAIN.
AND IN THE DARK. AND ON A TRAIN.
AND IN A CAR. AND IN A TREE.
THEY ARE SO GOOD, SO GOOD, YOU SEE!
SO I WILL EAT THEM IN A BOX.
AND I WILL EAT THEM WITH A FOX.
AND I WILL EAT THEM IN A HOUSE.
AND I WILL EAT THEM WITH A MOUSE.
AND I WILL EAT THEM HERE AND THERE.
SAY! I WILL EAT THEM ANYWHERE!
I DO SO LIKE GREEN EGGS AND HAM!
THANK YOU! THANK YOU, SAM I AM.

FUCK YOU.

Man, that was an awesome tale.

Wall of text in IB, yay

Well, opposing every staff decision sure feels more like "has it in for us" rather than "going separate ways". Although I might not know too well since apparently I'm "clingy" (Tell me again how that makes sense and a reason for not responding when waar made the same point?)

That's why I prefer talking to waar. You know, Clingy actually suits you well.

I have no idea what is happening... I lost the ability to read the walls of text halfway through.

You are dodging her questions pretty hard, any reason you wont meet her on the field?

Her violent intent is obvious as fuck. Why would I want to indulge that egobeast? Unlike we two who can see worth in each others reasoning, she just wants to assault and rape. verbally.