Nekokami (=^o^=)~nya!~ wrote...
PumpJack McGee wrote...
Nekokami (=^o^=)~nya!~ wrote...
I Nekokami (=^o^=)~nya!~, claim the silent, 4'-9''
Neopolitan a.k.a.
Neo from
RWBY
If I didn't have some weird-ass OCD thing about picking only one girl per series, I definitely woulda picked her up.
Top score.
One of the best archenemy couple
Were I not such a big fan of BumbleBee, I'd totally be on board. Well- still am, despite.
deadsx wrote...
Kinda curios about Cruz's Claim of Hex Maniac from Pokemon
I remember a few games ago, someone tried to Claim the Pokemon Gardivour, but that was invalid due to it not really being a specific one, but more of a species thing.
Would that be the same with Hex Maniac, since it's not really a specific person but a group of people?
In the end doesn't look like that rule is here anymore, but still curios.
Yeah, I'm gonna have to take a serious look at that at some point.
What's currently standing as law is:
-Class/Species are claimable, but
-If there are certain specific named characters of said Class/Species, those take absolute precedence and null all others.
So lessay- Saber, from Fate/Stay Etcetera.
If there were no named Sabers other than "Class: Saber"- one could claim "Saber" and catch'em all.
But since we have Saber:Arturia, Saber Nero, and Saber of Red, those are the claimable characters. No matter what other incarnations of Saber there may have been.
Of course- there is some bend and flex to this rule, as the aforementioned Hex Maniac.
Although the Pokemon Trainer classes do have names- such as Hex Maniac Luna- it is easy to see that the games do not pretend that there is any actual distinction between these characters as individual entities.
So- while named- the Hex Maniac stands as a valid claim, and nulls all instances of named Hex Maniacs.
If there is any doubt, simply link me all relevant information to said Class/Species that you'd like to claim, and I'll review it for yea/nay.
Also- I don't remember nulling any claims for Gardevoir-
quite the opposite, in fact.