yummines wrote...
Longevity wrote...
yummines wrote...
Not really. You still have to pay for Xbox Live and it still requires the Kinect (which in turn raises the price 100 compared to the PS4).
Now it's not completely trash hardware for most people, but I would say still loses out to the PS4.
You always had to pay for live, and if you can't afford 100 extra dollars you shouldn't buy any game console.
I enjoy having an online experience that isn't complete dicks, that's why I like Live over PSN.
Having to pay just to play games online is partly why I'm trying to save up for a new computer. A lot of big name games (such as Dark Souls 2 and Battlefield 4) are going to have pc releases anyhow.
Also, an extra hundred dollars is a pretty substantial difference. Especially if it's because of something like Kinect. Why pay 100 more dollars if you don't have to? Because the PS4 and Xbox One are essentially just upgrades from the previous generation, nothing really new or exciting. So it seems pointless to require the Kinect when all it does is hike up the price past its competitors.
Also what's wrong with the PSN? Whenever I play Dark Souls I'm fine, and it certainly isn't infamous for having little kids like Xbox Live is.
Xbox DID have something substantial over ps4, to justify the $100 increase, but then little crying faggots went and fucked that up, so now it's exactly the same as the ps4... just a ps3 (or rather 360) with new hardware.
They had the potential to make it fucking awesome, and people cried over it, like little fucking faggots.
And no, ps would be worse for it, cause it's free. I've only ever encountered one little faggot on xbl, which was during drifting in forza. He ran into everyone, and blamed them, calling them all retards. We kicked him after that. Called him a little bitch during.
also;