Epic Conflicts
0
lollollol12 wrote...
Ramsus wrote...
lollollol12 wrote...
2009, A MANY CONFLICTS HAPPEN BETWEEN MANY USERS ON A JAPANESE CARTOON PORNOGRAPHY WEBSITE AND ANOTHER USER WHO GOES BY THE INTERNET ALIAS OF "RAMSUS"I FEEL THIS WAS THE MOST EPIC CONFLICT BECAUSE OF HOW RAMSUS' RAGE LEVELS WERE REMARKABLY HIGH DURING CERTAIN TIMES OF DIFFERENT CONFLICTS. THE AMOUNT OF ENERGY EMITTED FROM A RAGED RAMSUS IS EQUAL TO ABOUT 25 HITLERS AND 1 MARTIN LUTHER KING JR MAKING A SPEECH
Pie Pie Pie Pie.....what? I'm having trouble caring when you talk. (I doubt this is an unusual problem around here.)
RAGED ME A RAMSUS LOL!!!!!!!!!!!
AND YOU OBVIOUSLY DO CARE BECAUSE YOU ALWAYS TYPE UP A RESPONSE
UNCLE PHIL, YOU ARE THE ONLY TROLL I WILL EVER HAVE THE HONOR OF RESPECTING.
Back on topic:
The French Revolution. It's epic because it's the only victory the French ever had.
0
PersonDude wrote...
lollollol12 wrote...
Ramsus wrote...
lollollol12 wrote...
2009, A MANY CONFLICTS HAPPEN BETWEEN MANY USERS ON A JAPANESE CARTOON PORNOGRAPHY WEBSITE AND ANOTHER USER WHO GOES BY THE INTERNET ALIAS OF "RAMSUS"I FEEL THIS WAS THE MOST EPIC CONFLICT BECAUSE OF HOW RAMSUS' RAGE LEVELS WERE REMARKABLY HIGH DURING CERTAIN TIMES OF DIFFERENT CONFLICTS. THE AMOUNT OF ENERGY EMITTED FROM A RAGED RAMSUS IS EQUAL TO ABOUT 25 HITLERS AND 1 MARTIN LUTHER KING JR MAKING A SPEECH
Pie Pie Pie Pie.....what? I'm having trouble caring when you talk. (I doubt this is an unusual problem around here.)
RAGED ME A RAMSUS LOL!!!!!!!!!!!
AND YOU OBVIOUSLY DO CARE BECAUSE YOU ALWAYS TYPE UP A RESPONSE
UNCLE PHIL, YOU ARE THE ONLY TROLL I WILL EVER HAVE THE HONOR OF RESPECTING.
Back on topic:
The French Revolution. It's epic because it's the only victory the French ever had.
What the French have more victories than defeats (it was on QI about how every one thinks they have more defeats when they actually have more victories)
0
Age wrote...
PersonDude wrote...
The French Revolution. It's epic because it's the only victory the French ever had.What the French have more victories than defeats (it was on QI about how every one thinks they have more defeats when they actually have more victories)
http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/text/france.html
Tally it up. I also over exaggerated for humor, though France still lost more than it ever won.
0
PersonDude wrote...
Age wrote...
PersonDude wrote...
The French Revolution. It's epic because it's the only victory the French ever had.What the French have more victories than defeats (it was on QI about how every one thinks they have more defeats when they actually have more victories)
http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/text/france.html
Tally it up.
I might be more inclined to believe it if it came from a legitimate and respectable source.
0
WWII due to the number of deaths and the numbers and countries involved. Or the Cold War due to the fact that the possibility of nuclear annihilation was present.
0
TheBlackLight wrote...
I might be more inclined to believe it if it came from a legitimate and respectable source.Look it up yourself. I'm too lazy to dig through all the sites since most "legit" places like to list how many battles were won rather than wars (which is what matters in the end).
0
TheBlackLight wrote...
WWII due to the number of deaths and the numbers and countries involved. Or the Cold War due to the fact that the possibility of nuclear annihilation was present.WWI had far more deaths than WWII.
The most "Epic" conflict is the one of different ideals. Ongoing to the present from as far back as 3000 years, different ideals is the first "epic conflict" in the line of starting other conflicts.
0
GameON wrote...
TheBlackLight wrote...
WWII due to the number of deaths and the numbers and countries involved. Or the Cold War due to the fact that the possibility of nuclear annihilation was present.WWI had far more deaths than WWII.
The most "Epic" conflict is the one of different ideals. Ongoing to the present from as far back as 3000 years, different ideals is the first "epic conflict" in the line of starting other conflicts.
Umm no, maybe for the Western Allies meaning Britain, France. But if you look at everyone else like Russia, and Asia; then WWII would be maybe even 10x more deaths than WWI. China alone had tens of millions of casualties.
Vietnam, a little country had close to a million people die of starvation due to Japanese, a number that would only be equaled by the more than decades long Vietnam War. Then if you count the deaths in the aftermath, then it maybe even worse.
For sure number, geopolitical scope, casualties and diversity of the people involved nothings beats WWII. IF you want to talk about ideals how about Communism vs Fascism. Democracy Vs Fascism. Chinese communist vs Chinese Nationalist. Chinese Communist vs Japanese Empire. Chinese Nationalist vs Japanese Empire. Wars of liberation against Western colonialism. Asia for Asians vs status quo.
My point is, you can't beat it, and if you wanted to even more bored you can find more ideological -ism vs -ism in WWII b/c everybody has unique reason to fight and WWII is the biggest conflict ever with the most number of people. I don't think you can be get more ideological than WWII.
0
zelgadis123 wrote...
GameON wrote...
TheBlackLight wrote...
WWII due to the number of deaths and the numbers and countries involved. Or the Cold War due to the fact that the possibility of nuclear annihilation was present.WWI had far more deaths than WWII.
The most "Epic" conflict is the one of different ideals. Ongoing to the present from as far back as 3000 years, different ideals is the first "epic conflict" in the line of starting other conflicts.
Umm no, maybe for the Western Allies meaning Britain, France. But if you look at everyone else like Russia, and Asia; then WWII would be maybe even 10x more deaths than WWI. China alone had tens of millions of casualties.
Vietnam, a little country had close to a million people die of starvation due to Japanese, a number that would only be equaled by the more than decades long Vietnam War. Then if you count the deaths in the aftermath, then it maybe even worse.
For sure number, geopolitical scope, casualties and diversity of the people involved nothings beats WWII. IF you want to talk about ideals how about Communism vs Fascism. Democracy Vs Fascism. Chinese communist vs Chinese Nationalist. Chinese Communist vs Japanese Empire. Chinese Nationalist vs Japanese Empire. Wars of liberation against Western colonialism. Asia for Asians vs status quo.
My point is, you can't beat it, and if you wanted to even more bored you can find more ideological -ism vs -ism in WWII b/c everybody has unique reason to fight and WWII is the biggest conflict ever with the most number of people. I don't think you can be get more ideological than WWII.
Exactly. A technological revolution also occurred giving us planes without propellers than can break the sound barrier and submarines. As for the casualties WWII had close to 70 million while WWI had less than 20 million.
0
TheBlackLight wrote...
WWII due to the number of deaths and the numbers and countries involved. Or the Cold War due to the fact that the possibility of nuclear annihilation was present.Hahaha, the Cold War. That wasn't even a war, it was 2 countries lying to each other about how good thier stuff was.
