FEATURED IN FORBES!
0
In the words of Jacob, "We Forbes now"
Whatcha think? This is some seriously awesome press for the site!
Whatcha think? This is some seriously awesome press for the site!
1
Xenon
FAKKU Writer
Poorly began and containing errors, it starts off on the wrong foot.
It's not planning to make anyone do anything. The sentence comes off as opinionated and negative. If she wanted to make this sentence more factual, she may have considered writing something along the lines of "After eight years of freely offering many forms of aggregated hentai, a pornographic subgenre of Japanese anime—Fakku.net is planning to offer licensed and copyrighted material for a price." Also, there's an overlooked typo.
Removing all unlicensed what? We know but anyone who doesn't know the site or what's happening doesn't. I'll attribute this to hasty writing and yet another overlooked typo. Simply add the word "material" after "unlicensed."
She had to write "or so" to cover her ground because no number has yet been announced, as far as I'm aware, for how much the monthly subscription will yet cost. As such, it's purely conjecture and has no place in a factual news piece.
The rest of the article seems fine and factual enough from a neutral journalistic perspective. Sad that it begins in such a way.
You're not the author, are you gizgal?
"After eight years of offering every form of aggregated hentai, a pornograhic subgenre of Japanese anime—Fakku.net is planning to make people pay."
It's not planning to make anyone do anything. The sentence comes off as opinionated and negative. If she wanted to make this sentence more factual, she may have considered writing something along the lines of "After eight years of freely offering many forms of aggregated hentai, a pornographic subgenre of Japanese anime—Fakku.net is planning to offer licensed and copyrighted material for a price." Also, there's an overlooked typo.
"Fakku CEO Jacob Grady, says the site is in the process of removing all unlicensed in preparation of its premium launch at the end of 2015."
Removing all unlicensed what? We know but anyone who doesn't know the site or what's happening doesn't. I'll attribute this to hasty writing and yet another overlooked typo. Simply add the word "material" after "unlicensed."
"Grady believes that despite the Internet’s embarrassment of pornographic riches, Fakku.net’s fans will chip in $10 or so a month for subscriptions."
She had to write "or so" to cover her ground because no number has yet been announced, as far as I'm aware, for how much the monthly subscription will yet cost. As such, it's purely conjecture and has no place in a factual news piece.
The rest of the article seems fine and factual enough from a neutral journalistic perspective. Sad that it begins in such a way.
You're not the author, are you gizgal?
0
Xenon wrote...
Poorly began and containing errors, it starts off on the wrong foot."After eight years of offering every form of aggregated hentai, a pornograhic subgenre of Japanese anime—Fakku.net is planning to make people pay."
It's not planning to make anyone do anything. The sentence comes off as opinionated and negative. If she wanted to make this sentence more factual, she may have considered writing something along the lines of "After eight years of freely offering many forms of aggregated hentai, a pornographic subgenre of Japanese anime—Fakku.net is planning to offer licensed and copyrighted material for a price." Also, there's an overlooked typo.
"Fakku CEO Jacob Grady, says the site is in the process of removing all unlicensed in preparation of its premium launch at the end of 2015."
Removing all unlicensed what? We know but anyone who doesn't know the site or what's happening doesn't. I'll attribute this to hasty writing and yet another overlooked typo. Simply add the word "material" after "unlicensed."
"Grady believes that despite the Internet’s embarrassment of pornographic riches, Fakku.net’s fans will chip in $10 or so a month for subscriptions."
She had to write "or so" to cover her ground because no number has yet been announced, as far as I'm aware, for how much the monthly subscription will yet cost. As such, it's purely conjecture and has no place in a factual news piece.
The rest of the article seems fine and factual enough from a neutral journalistic perspective. Sad that it begins in such a way.
You're not the author, are you gizgal?
No, but given that Jake shared it on his public Facebook page, pretty sure this all comes from the horse-mask's mouth so to speak.
Lol I WISH I had a public venue to chat about Fakku to business people, but alas, no such clout.