blind_assassin wrote...
You're actually pretty much the least scientific person I've ever met.
That's because I mixed science with faith. This is your own comment of me. I can agree that many others in this community will undoubtedly say the same thing. However, I am not alone in the want to understand life further than just physically.
blind_assassin wrote...
but when you say things like "Humans can do telekinesis" you're making a claim that has a scientific basis without any evidence to support it and in the face of a great amount of evidence to the contrary.
I cannot show any sense of evidence due to the fact that the world sees it as fake. The type of evidence I hold are all based within spiritual understanding. For example, at times we randomly shiver. Not because it's cold, just a random shiver. This is because energy is scattered and the body did not maintain it. Surely, anyone can say that it's a random sort of thing that comes in everyday life. I cannot sound convincing unless spiritual logic is at use. Why it's logical? because this shivering can be called upon anytime the person wants to. Generating energy within the body then.. losing it. It shows that the person is a newbie at it and is trying soemthing..
blind_assassin wrote...
There's a difference between being "open-minded" and "having faith" and believing nonsense for no good reason. I'm fond of the saying "It's great to have an open mind but not so open your brains fall out".
I'm still open-minded. I can't quite pinpoint whether having faith is the right word being this far in research. Believing nonsense has their reasons. Using spiritual energy has their benefits. Such as healing parts of the body without any medical treatment.
blind_assassin wrote...
The problem with what you're saying isn't just that it's not something I personally believe in but that your thought process is all over the place and contradictory. You said that you don't listen to anecdotes (good for you) and then that you get information from people directly, which is listening to anecdotes.
That is because the information I've laid here are not structured accordingly. It takes time to properly convince a science person. It took me half a year sitting next to my classmate in 2005 before I was properly convinced by some personal proof.
anâ‹…ecâ‹…dote
†‚ †‚/ˈænɪkËŒdoÊŠt/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [an-ik-doht]
–noun
a short account of a particular incident or event of an interesting or amusing nature, often biographical.
3 years isn't what I'd call a short amount of time. Considering that 3 years is 1/6th of my lifetime. Sure my mates had "stories" to tell, like how seeing ghosts screwed his everyday life and how he saw this one dude die from a heart attack. But the information I took in were his random claims as how spirits act and all that. I refuse to believe that he has made up all of what he's claimed within the instances of when we talked without flinching throughout the year.
blind_assassin wrote...
To put it simply, once we learn something truthful it becomes science. If ghosts were proven to be fact they would become part of science.
That is how I see it. If I could, I'd replace the word "belief" to "fact" to the things I've mentioned. However, it isn't easy to claim it as fact. Several people tried, and they got mowed down like how I am atm.
blind_assassin wrote...
The example of learning an objective meaning of life is worthless since personal value is not a scientific question.
I am not the only person in this world who claims such nonsense.
This site is dedicated to paranormal science.
This guy is doing his own research in paranormals. And
this person wrote a whole book just to try relate paranormal thinking into science.
I know my references are not creditable as there are no signs of reliability upon them. The point is that there are others like me who are studying in order to understand. Of course I don't record them on paper like people who
are scientists.
blind_assassin wrote...
As for Cyril, he's clearly a magician/mentalist. I mean, he's doing coin tricks, not moving things with his mind.
I understand your pattern of thinking. I hope this video shows more than hands going through glass and coins coming out of hands. Cyril is only one source of information. I'll understand if this is still considerably fake. If the concluding thoughts after watching this video is "He has strings", then I cannot further try to explain how he does it; As it seems that whatever I say has that sense of "nonsense" and "not thoughtfully claimed".
blind_assassin wrote...
Finally, skeptical behaviour is the exact opposite of natural human behaviour. The human brain is designed to naturally believe things without questioning them. The hypothesis for this is that it goes back to caveman times where if you saw a bush rustle you'd figure "tiger" rather than "I should investigate" because the latter is more likely to get you killed.
I see skeptical behaviour as "That aint logical, it's fake. If there's no hard evidence, it's fake. Whatever you're saying, it's nonsense". I agree that is how natural human behaviour normally are. But it still doesn't take away that humans are naturally skeptical if they don't understand it. That caveman must've had experience before naturally seeing the rustling bush as danger. I would say that the caveman would've pondered what could be in there at first with caution, if he never had experience in relation to it before.
Your statement agreed upon what I've said. That is, normal people judged on the spot based on what they already know without investigation.
blind_assassin wrote...
Real scientists and skeptics like to be proven wrong. When someone discovers that, yes indeed Uranus' orbit is being screwed up by a yet unknown planet, it creates a new thing to study and learn. When we learn that, no, there is no Planet X, it's nice to not have to rewrite textbooks but it's a shame that we don't get a new thing to study.
Yeah... I can't say anything more. I am the only lunatic here.
Seeing that many people here unquestionably agree that my claims are of stupidity, I'll stop my rant here :/ I've had enough trying to defend my position... Atleast you know what and how I'm thinking.
Thread is out of topic, I know sorry isn't enough, but I'm sorry to have caused unwanted ruckus here.