ShaggyJebus wrote...
This is a subject that's been brought up on
House a couple of times, without a "right" answer ever being offered. It's always interested me when I've seen it, so now I'm sharing it with you.
Let's say that a man is a genius. He's a medical researcher, and given enough time, he may be able to find a cure for AIDs and cancer. At the age of 30, he decides that he doesn't want to do research anymore; he becomes a barber instead.
If he continues in the medical field, he will help save millions of lives. But he doesn't want to work in that field any more. Does anyone truly have the right to say that he is wrong in his decision, or to force him to do research?
Some people are really good at certain things, so good that it almost seems like they have an obligation to do what they're good at. But each person is in charge of his own life, and he can decide what he wants to do and what he doesn't want to do. If a person doesn't want to do that which he is good at, can anyone say that he is "wasting" his talent? It's his to waste, so to speak.
Or should people with extraordinary abilities give up their personal desires and do what is "better for the world"?
Of course you can say their decision is wrong. But does that make it true? Facts and truths are two separate things. Anything in existence is a truth, especially ideas. Not much of an answer, but take from it what you will. Also, I just want to increase my post count :P