J.D. wrote...
If I notice something detrimental, I give the transgressor time to fess up to it, because I don't feel it's good to deprive others of the ability to redeem themselves.
I am very clear about what I will say and do if something persists. I come up to someone no more than three times and ask if they have had time to think about it. I ask, "How much time do you think you'll need to make a decision?" If they tell me a time frame, I keep tabs and wait for that time to come; if they don't have a definite time frame, I give them one. If by the third time, they haven't thought about their actions or fessed up, I warn them and tell them the next day I will do something about it, because caring for someone is hard enough - just standing by and watching someone you care about getting hurt is intolerable. This gets people angry but then they end up fessing up to it themselves. Rofl.
Illusions and Love do not go together. It is liberating to be honest, because if the transgressed can understand and work around it, the dynamic of the relationship changes, often for the better. Also, it isn't good to be caught in a loveless and dishonest relationship for either party, even for the person doing bad things to the other. It is better to sever ties - even between son and daughter, or two married people. Sometimes the responsibility of happiness requires such hard measures.
I Really like this advice. Need to make more posts tho before I can + rep :( I think the majority consensus is that we would all break the news to the person that should know the truth. I think the key point is timing and your approach depending on the personality that's been mentioned before.
OH! and the one thing I'd like to add to this topic is ABOVE ALL ELSE
After you break the news to this person (and assuming you really care about this person) that you ABSOLUTELY state at the end of breaking the news
"...but, I'll be here with you by your side, every step of the way." Or something along those lines.
I think this is the part where a lot of people flounder on or just skip.
Personally, if I can't be there for the person after I break the news to them to be able to support them through their hardship (i.e. - personal feeling of responsibility), then I'd rather take a real hard and long look through if i really want to tell that person the bad news. Doubly so if I care about them a lot.
It's easy to be the messenger, it's harder to be be the messenger and then the friend.
Of course this is all along the assumption that you care about the person, if not, meh I guess just tell them, then run for the hills. :P