Chlor wrote...
I can honestly say that I would fight harder for my cause if people were trying to get me to back down for reasons like this, childish perhaps but I think most people would act like this as well when the ones protesting have no legal backing, and nothing more than a personal reason to why they disprove of it. The general Muslim-community is already shunned upon, and protesting against something like this just feeds the prejudices people have.
I agree with everything up to this point, but...
Chlor wrote...
I can honestly see no bad side with the Cultural Center. Except that the kids hanging around might befriend a Muslim, and we can't have that, can we?
This is the way I'm interpreting the quoted statement (I may be over simplifying): "Americans hate Muslims. Americans don't want to mingle with Muslims. Therefore, Americans do not want to tolerate a Muslim Cultural Center/Mosque where mingling may occur. The controversy in NYC can be explained through the aforementioned reasoning."
The problem with this is there are mosques built all over the US. There might be minor issues here and there we may never hear about, but they are still allowed to build where ever they please. This disproves your theory that Americans trying to hinder the Muslims progress just because they hate Muslims. The Americans are angry because of another
factor and I think you're having a problem of adding this
factor into your equation when it comes to the issue.
You may say all lumping everyone in the Muslim faith together is wrong, but looking at the overall picture, people will view that they've all fallen from the same tree.
For example, in a professional workplace, if one employee screws up, in the eye of the customer the whole business has failed to provide the service they've promised.
Is it true? No. But is it human? Yes.
If you really wish to make a difference, we can continue with my analogy:
If a business wants to get back in good favors with the customer again, they often comply with the customer's irrational demands instead of plowing through with their own logic. This would only incite the customer further into thinking the company is worthless even if the corporation is in the right.
What I'm trying to get at is this: If the Imam was really making an effort to bridge the gap between the two factions, he would have found another place.
Again, I am not saying Americans are being rational, and what I said above is the action the Imam should have taken. I am just writing to let you know that he is unintentionally rubbing salt on a wound that hasn't been closed yet, which is also the missing
factor in your equation.
Tegumi wrote...
Perhaps it was froth with consideration, just not practicality? I'd garner that the proposal was made before they realized how overly bigoted the American public is.
I think it's just normal human behavior. Opinions.