Laggi wrote...
It's actually the same situation:
If a guy has his face full of scars and is losing an eye, losing hiw lower jaw or whatever. According to law, he is allowed to walk around without covering up his face, even if people are bothered by it.
The guy who walks around in his underwear is allowed to go wherever he pleases in his boxers, even if people are whining about it. As long as those underwear cover his genitals.
There's no law (atleast in Finland) saying that you need to wear shoes, a shirt and pants that cover your legs in order to walk outside. There's just a law saying that you are not allowed to expose your genitalia in public places.
You see people jogging around with only their shoes on, and shorts that are basically as tight as speedos.
Not to mention the guy was in his underwear IN HIS OWN HOUSE. Where the law saying you have to cover yourself up doesn't apply.
Edit: I'm not saying you shouldn't put on clothes when someone asks you to, ofcourse you can do that if you want to be nice to them or whatever, but you are under no obligation to actually obey them and do it.
If you wish to stay in your underwear and they're gonna call cops on you, just let them do it and get them fined for disturbing your privacy.
It's my point-of-view I guess.
I'd never expect someone to actually be such a douche to tell someone to cover up their face because they were an accident.
But, I find that putting some clothes on when going outside, and closing your blinds so no one sees you half-naked is the better thing to do than being an ass and not taking the other persons feelings into consideration.
However, It always depends on how that person approached you.
You are correct when you say they cannot do anything about it.
If they call the cops because you are walking outside in your underwear...that is a little ridiculous. Unless you are purposely trying to irk the lady who was bothered,and in that case, you are a douche.
All I can say is don't expect to have any fans in your neighborhood, haha.