(>'.')>¿;= wrote...
The Jesus wrote...
Reality as it is, is conceived by perception. Infallible or not, one cannot deny what they experience through their senses. Likewise, if one perceives something within their mind, it is impossible to say that it doesn't exist, even if we can't have first hand knowledge of it.
to keep the matter of perception of reality fresh i refer you to the symptoms of
sleep paralysis. the ideology of existence versus being became a nightly ordeal for me to verify due to this condition. dark figures would appear from benighted corners and corridors with the intent of 'killing me', the reality of it being that i was forced asleep. i couldnt move and could only whisper during there approach, remaining paralyzed in somewhat of a pre-slumber. the result of these hallucinations were nightmares of me and my family dying or suffering horribly by the figures hands. i was forced to deny these acts of malicious intent verity to insure a somewhat normal childhood.
i didnt perceive these images within my mind, the mind fabricated them into reality. the only differential between these visions and a halucination is that these figures physically interacted with me, i could feel a grip on my throat or a sharp pain in my stomach.
so i ask you jesus, what does one make of something when it is perceived by the concious as a true to life threat but subconciously aware that it is capable of no physical harm? what does the experience become?
Its fairly obvious that our ideas of reality, being, and existence differ. I don't mean to say that you are wrong. Its just that I can only go on what I know. An experience is an experience, regardless of the conscious and subconscious awareness. In my personal opinion, I can say anything exists, but at the same time it doesn't. However, I find that as a subjective being, its natural to argue on the behalf of existence. Its pretty difficult for me, personally, because for so long I've attempted to see things as objectively or, more realistically, with as little subjectivity, as possible. The whole point of what I'm saying is, that from a subjective opinion anything we acknowledge, in anyway, exists.
As I argued in the way of nothingness, in recognizing that it is the absence of anything, it becomes something. Therefore, any argument regarding nothingness as not existing is pointless. In regard to dreams, the same can be said. We can deny that they are real, but in effect we are affirming their existence. Even if we ignore something, the fact still remains that in our minds there is something to ignore. Mental fabrication implies that there is something within your mind, conscious or subconscious, there is something to be fabricated. What you define as real depends on your subjective opinion, but it would seem to me that making a statement that anything doesn't exist is a contradiction of itself.