Future "use" of 'Kuratas' Mech. (Potential use for war)
0
Chlor wrote...
That reactor is already almost 3 meters tall and 2 meters wide, and it would have to be fitted with enough armored plating to withstand a lot of force if it is to be used in combat. There's a reason we haven't fitted our tanks with nuclear cores already - they're to dangerous and take up too much space, it works on a submarine, but not on a (relatively) small tank. One of these mechs fitted with a nuclear core would suddenly weigh twice of what it already does. It's not a realistic idea."Force fields" in the regard of what they're talking about in that article is a long way from what I'd call a "field". A burst of electromagnetic energy that last for less than a second is not what I'd quite call "safe defence", it could never be used practically in combat.
Five years? No way, 50 years for this to leave the experimental labs, with luck. EDIT: - Alright, that might be an overstatement, but yeah, a few decades at the very least.
While I agree that it is, today, inconceivable to put together a mecha or a tank with these technologies and have it be efficient, I must bring something to attention: in the last 20 years, we have made more scientific discoveries than in the last century (maybe not as important for some, but valid and useful nontheless for the progress of science).
It took 5 years to perfect this portable nuclear core. In the next five years maybe they'll have discovered how to miniaturize even more. Maybe this "magnetic impulse" system will have improved greatly, and will have a reload time of fractions of milliseconds.
Not to say that I don't acknowledge that today it is impossible, but let us face it: science fiction is being caught up, or at least its borders have started merging with reality. And the process will speed up, until we either destroy ourselves or find an equilibrium.
0
DaSheepdogg87
Noobish Ronin
Try posting about this again in a 100 or so years. We are nowhere near the technology need to make these into weapons systems due to the fact that a walking mech would be way too slow and too big a target vertically for any type of anti-armor weapon tthat a common soldier could use aside from maybe adapting it for defensive purposes at one fixed location it would be a waste of both money and time to make and transport these.
Not to mention that most militaries require trained mechanics for a monstrosity such as this. think of the time and money they would spend just getting them trained and then keeping them in the military after their service time was up.
Simply put the whole thing is a waste of effort and R&D funds, we'd be better off developing better tech for our current heavy systems such as armor, fuel and weaponry, but even more importantly way to keep soldiers from dying the moment they step into a combat zone
Not to mention that most militaries require trained mechanics for a monstrosity such as this. think of the time and money they would spend just getting them trained and then keeping them in the military after their service time was up.
Simply put the whole thing is a waste of effort and R&D funds, we'd be better off developing better tech for our current heavy systems such as armor, fuel and weaponry, but even more importantly way to keep soldiers from dying the moment they step into a combat zone
0
Flaser
OCD Hentai Collector
Gubi wrote...
Chlor wrote...
That reactor is already almost 3 meters tall and 2 meters wide, and it would have to be fitted with enough armored plating to withstand a lot of force if it is to be used in combat. There's a reason we haven't fitted our tanks with nuclear cores already - they're to dangerous and take up too much space, it works on a submarine, but not on a (relatively) small tank. One of these mechs fitted with a nuclear core would suddenly weigh twice of what it already does. It's not a realistic idea."Force fields" in the regard of what they're talking about in that article is a long way from what I'd call a "field". A burst of electromagnetic energy that last for less than a second is not what I'd quite call "safe defence", it could never be used practically in combat.
Five years? No way, 50 years for this to leave the experimental labs, with luck. EDIT: - Alright, that might be an overstatement, but yeah, a few decades at the very least.
While I agree that it is, today, inconceivable to put together a mecha or a tank with these technologies and have it be efficient, I must bring something to attention: in the last 20 years, we have made more scientific discoveries than in the last century (maybe not as important for some, but valid and useful nontheless for the progress of science).
It took 5 years to perfect this portable nuclear core. In the next five years maybe they'll have discovered how to miniaturize even more. Maybe this "magnetic impulse" system will have improved greatly, and will have a reload time of fractions of milliseconds.
Not to say that I don't acknowledge that today it is impossible, but let us face it: science fiction is being caught up, or at least its borders have started merging with reality. And the process will speed up, until we either destroy ourselves or find an equilibrium.
1) The reporter who wrote article about "force-fields" is a dumbass, as he didn't understand what he was writing about. It's not a "force-field", it's reactive armor that uses a highly charged conductive layer sandwiched into the armor itself. When a penetrator makes contact (either the plasma jet from a shaped charge or a kinetic penetrator), the charge is discharged, vaporizing the penetrator and greatly reducing its effectiveness.
2) You can't miniaturize nuclear power-plants like you do computers. You gotta have a sufficient neutron-flux, to keep the reaction going. Using better enriched fuel, reflectors, etc. can make it smaller, however these have been developed long ago for submarine reactors... and such "mil-spec" reactors (running on highly enriched fuel, almost weapons grade) are still not small enough to fit on a tank that's reasonably small. (You can't just make it bigger... then it can't cross bridges that weren't specially reinforced, nor fit through tunnels and let's not forget that tanks are typically transported to the battlefield, as they're not designed to cross long distances on their own, so you'd need to redesign all your transport vehicles from ships, through airplanes/helicopters to trains.).
0
Flaser wrote...
Gubi wrote...
Chlor wrote...
That reactor is already almost 3 meters tall and 2 meters wide, and it would have to be fitted with enough armored plating to withstand a lot of force if it is to be used in combat. There's a reason we haven't fitted our tanks with nuclear cores already - they're to dangerous and take up too much space, it works on a submarine, but not on a (relatively) small tank. One of these mechs fitted with a nuclear core would suddenly weigh twice of what it already does. It's not a realistic idea."Force fields" in the regard of what they're talking about in that article is a long way from what I'd call a "field". A burst of electromagnetic energy that last for less than a second is not what I'd quite call "safe defence", it could never be used practically in combat.
Five years? No way, 50 years for this to leave the experimental labs, with luck. EDIT: - Alright, that might be an overstatement, but yeah, a few decades at the very least.
While I agree that it is, today, inconceivable to put together a mecha or a tank with these technologies and have it be efficient, I must bring something to attention: in the last 20 years, we have made more scientific discoveries than in the last century (maybe not as important for some, but valid and useful nontheless for the progress of science).
It took 5 years to perfect this portable nuclear core. In the next five years maybe they'll have discovered how to miniaturize even more. Maybe this "magnetic impulse" system will have improved greatly, and will have a reload time of fractions of milliseconds.
Not to say that I don't acknowledge that today it is impossible, but let us face it: science fiction is being caught up, or at least its borders have started merging with reality. And the process will speed up, until we either destroy ourselves or find an equilibrium.
1) The reporter who wrote article about "force-fields" is a dumbass, as he didn't understand what he was writing about. It's not a "force-field", it's reactive armor that uses a highly charged conductive layer sandwiched into the armor itself. When a penetrator makes contact (either the plasma jet from a shaped charge or a kinetic penetrator), the charge is discharged, vaporizing the penetrator and greatly reducing its effectiveness.
2) You can't miniaturize nuclear power-plants like you do computers. You gotta have a sufficient neutron-flux, to keep the reaction going. Using better enriched fuel, reflectors, etc. can make it smaller, however these have been developed long ago for submarine reactors... and such "mil-spec" reactors (running on highly enriched fuel, almost weapons grade) are still not small enough to fit on a tank that's reasonably small. (You can't just make it bigger... then it can't cross bridges that weren't specially reinforced, nor fit through tunnels and let's not forget that tanks are typically transported to the battlefield, as they're not designed to cross long distances on their own, so you'd need to redesign all your transport vehicles from ships, through airplanes/helicopters to trains.).
To follow up on both your points:
1) I had understood that this would consist of a discharge of an electromagnetic pulse aiming to disable/destroy/deviate incoming projectiles of balistic form.
My bad if I hadn't understood it well.
2)NOt in a tank, but in a giant mecha? Miniaturization has its limits, but to assume that we have attained the minimum size of a nuclear reactor when they have barely existed 50 years is preposterous.
Though I have little too no knowlegde of the functioning of a reactor (in details that is) and cannot verify your saying that a stable, minimum size of neutron-flux is necessary to enable fission, I can say one thing: that these mechas will need power.Lots of it.
If it is not nuclear power that will enable them to sustain themselves, then what? My hypothesis of the force field/energetic protection and generator duo needs a sufficient amount of energy to function.
Thus the energy supply needs to be enormous, for the mecha to be on the one part worth using and sustainable on long fights/distances.
Or my hypothesis is just not realistic and born from my scifi fed mind.
0
Seeing as they're probably insanely expensive, require custom production equipment, and aren't very easy to transport?
No, I don't see these as a threat to civilization any time soon.
No, I don't see these as a threat to civilization any time soon.
0
Gubi wrote...
[...]these mechas will need power.Lots of it.If it is not nuclear power that will enable them to sustain themselves, then what? My hypothesis of the force field/energetic protection and generator duo needs a sufficient amount of energy to function.
Thus the energy supply needs to be enormous, for the mecha to be on the one part worth using and sustainable on long fights/distances.
Or my hypothesis is just not realistic and born from my scifi fed mind.
Yeah.
0
Flaser
OCD Hentai Collector
Gubi wrote...
Flaser wrote...
Gubi wrote...
Chlor wrote...
That reactor is already almost 3 meters tall and 2 meters wide, and it would have to be fitted with enough armored plating to withstand a lot of force if it is to be used in combat. There's a reason we haven't fitted our tanks with nuclear cores already - they're to dangerous and take up too much space, it works on a submarine, but not on a (relatively) small tank. One of these mechs fitted with a nuclear core would suddenly weigh twice of what it already does. It's not a realistic idea."Force fields" in the regard of what they're talking about in that article is a long way from what I'd call a "field". A burst of electromagnetic energy that last for less than a second is not what I'd quite call "safe defence", it could never be used practically in combat.
Five years? No way, 50 years for this to leave the experimental labs, with luck. EDIT: - Alright, that might be an overstatement, but yeah, a few decades at the very least.
While I agree that it is, today, inconceivable to put together a mecha or a tank with these technologies and have it be efficient, I must bring something to attention: in the last 20 years, we have made more scientific discoveries than in the last century (maybe not as important for some, but valid and useful nontheless for the progress of science).
It took 5 years to perfect this portable nuclear core. In the next five years maybe they'll have discovered how to miniaturize even more. Maybe this "magnetic impulse" system will have improved greatly, and will have a reload time of fractions of milliseconds.
Not to say that I don't acknowledge that today it is impossible, but let us face it: science fiction is being caught up, or at least its borders have started merging with reality. And the process will speed up, until we either destroy ourselves or find an equilibrium.
1) The reporter who wrote article about "force-fields" is a dumbass, as he didn't understand what he was writing about. It's not a "force-field", it's reactive armor that uses a highly charged conductive layer sandwiched into the armor itself. When a penetrator makes contact (either the plasma jet from a shaped charge or a kinetic penetrator), the charge is discharged, vaporizing the penetrator and greatly reducing its effectiveness.
2) You can't miniaturize nuclear power-plants like you do computers. You gotta have a sufficient neutron-flux, to keep the reaction going. Using better enriched fuel, reflectors, etc. can make it smaller, however these have been developed long ago for submarine reactors... and such "mil-spec" reactors (running on highly enriched fuel, almost weapons grade) are still not small enough to fit on a tank that's reasonably small. (You can't just make it bigger... then it can't cross bridges that weren't specially reinforced, nor fit through tunnels and let's not forget that tanks are typically transported to the battlefield, as they're not designed to cross long distances on their own, so you'd need to redesign all your transport vehicles from ships, through airplanes/helicopters to trains.).
To follow up on both your points:
1) I had understood that this would consist of a discharge of an electromagnetic pulse aiming to disable/destroy/deviate incoming projectiles of balistic form.
My bad if I hadn't understood it well.
2)NOt in a tank, but in a giant mecha? Miniaturization has its limits, but to assume that we have attained the minimum size of a nuclear reactor when they have barely existed 50 years is preposterous.
Though I have little too no knowlegde of the functioning of a reactor (in details that is) and cannot verify your saying that a stable, minimum size of neutron-flux is necessary to enable fission, I can say one thing: that these mechas will need power.Lots of it.
If it is not nuclear power that will enable them to sustain themselves, then what? My hypothesis of the force field/energetic protection and generator duo needs a sufficient amount of energy to function.
Thus the energy supply needs to be enormous, for the mecha to be on the one part worth using and sustainable on long fights/distances.
Or my hypothesis is just not realistic and born from my scifi fed mind.
A nuclear reactor operates on the principle of nuclear fission sustained by a chain reaction. All known fissile materials, have a given probability to fission when hit with a neutron. This is not 100%. When fission *does* occur, you get fissison products (the split remains of the old nucleus) and 2 or 3 (on average 2.4) free neutrons, that can go on and produce further fission reactions... or just get wasted, being absorbed or leaving the reactor space without doing any work.
For a working reactor you need to keep the number of fissions going high enough by keeping absorption and neutron escape in control, so the reaction can sustain itself. Neutron flux, is a fancy way to refer to the neutron density for a given space.
Increasing the reactor / fuel size increases the chance of a reaction occurring, as neutrons have a lot more chance to split an atom as they need to go through more fuel before leaving the reactor.
The reverse is also true, the smaller the reactor, the harder to keep the reaction going, as you'll loose a lot more neutrons, escaping the reactor chamber without having caused a reaction.
Choosing the right fuel can also help, keep a high flux. Remember when I said that fuel doesn't have a 100% chance to fission? U-238, the bulk of natural uranium has a lousy tendency to just absorb neutrons (...and through a beta decay chain, eventually transform into Pu-239, the stuff used in neutron bombs). U-235 by comparison is quite a handy fuel, but you need to process your fuel with very expensive enrichment processes to increase its quantity.
(This is because U-238 & U-235 are chemically identical. They react the same way in chemical processes. The only way to separate them, is to use the minuscule difference in density - as U-238 has 3 more neutrons).
Having a highly enriched fuel will make absorption less likely, hence make it possible to build a smaller reactor.
...I could go on and on, the bottom line doesn't change:
These engineering constraints are dictated by nuclear physics itself, and are already pretty well known and we've already hit the physical limits of reactor design quite a while ago.
Some tricks may remain, like using fuel in liquid nuclear salts instead solid oxides, however I don't think you could make fission reactors small enough for use in most fighting vehicles.
(Isotope electric power sources are another issue, albeit even more - say a 1000 times - expensive then fission reactors, as you'd need to artificially create your fuel in breeder reactors. Americium was often proposed for this).
0
regardless whether this gets into a killing machine in the future, I think this is pretty cool. i'm a huge mecha fan so this is not a surprise~
0
What would be really cool is a Zoids-esque experiment. I remember watching New Century Zero and just wanting to PWN everyone with the Berserk Fury, good times. Seriously, Fury and Elephander were the most broken zoids in that series, Bit was just lucky for Main Character PLOX.
In all seriousness, as Flaser says, the combination of current technological limits as it regards nuclear enhancement, as well as economic infeasibility as well as militaristic infeasibility, the likelihood of a mobile suit, gundam, etc is still decades away.
But I think Zoids are truly feasible, they can't be that much larger than your average tank or require that much more power.
In all seriousness, as Flaser says, the combination of current technological limits as it regards nuclear enhancement, as well as economic infeasibility as well as militaristic infeasibility, the likelihood of a mobile suit, gundam, etc is still decades away.
But I think Zoids are truly feasible, they can't be that much larger than your average tank or require that much more power.
0
Flaser wrote...
Lishy1 wrote...
We already use mechas. They're called tanks and drones.Ah, a Sane poster at last.
But humongous mecha as a weapon platform? ROLF.
Tanks have a lower profile, sloped armor, bigger area to distribute their weight and lot less unarmored joints & axles to get shot to bits (...or spend days, maintaining). Tanks are already maintenance hogs, mecha would be all the more worse.
I was also going to say this; while mechas are aesthetically cool, they're extremely impractical on the field of war (anything aesthetically pleasing generally doesn't fit in war; war is about practicality and efficiency) Mecha are only easier to hit, with a less efficient method of moving, and yes, those weak joints as well, all with the same armaments.
Only in fantasy...
0
We can't ruled out the possibility of mecha in the battlefield. Todays technology are getting old it's no better than those technology that we once say imperfect as long these mecha haven't been use in real combat it's to early to ruled out this technology.
0
Will the Kuratas be implemented? No. Will something like the Kuratas be implemented? No.
Mechs are inefficient. They have low mobility and are really just heavily armored troopers. They are based on human physiology which is already inefficient. Do I think they will be implemented in war or the military? Maybe, but probably not much more than utility or for show. A squad of marines could easily surround such a creation and sabotage it in seconds, taking advantage of the low maneuverability. Or, you could just pick it off with an A2S or S2S missile. Even a lone tank is vastly superior to any mech we could make in the next 100 or so years.
A little off topic, but do you know what I really want to see our militaries develop in the next 100 years? Bolos. Those motherfuckers could tear anybody and anything a new one. They would be a hell of a lot more fun to pilot than any mech, for sure. Oh, and kudos to those who actually know what a Bolo is and have read Keith Laumer's works.
Now to address everyone else.
OP, you are as paranoid as fuck. Just get over the fact that as humans we like to kill each other, and you'll live a much calmer and relaxed life. Also, do a little bit of research for crying out loud.
After reading the other posts, I'm glad others are sane. And I was going to have a blast of fun and retort everyone. Shame. I guess I'll address the incompetent posts.
Actually, yes we can. Its called the design cycle. All technology must work on paper and in idea first, then it must work in computer simulations, then it must work in the lab, and THEN you can test the prototype on a mock battlefield. As we are doing here, we are ruling out mechs at the idea stage because of their sheer impracticality. And where are you pulling that this bullshit that our technology is getting old? Compared to what? The technology that we have today is the medium of comparison. Your post makes no sense.
Nope. The main issue with mechs is, as I've already said, is that they are based on our inefficient human physiology.
Lets start at the beginning. The whole point of a mech is that it is an armored shell; it has to protect the squishy human inside while dealing as much damage as possible. Thus, it has to be heavily armored, with a cockpit designed to withstand high kinetic blasts and energies. As you add on armor, you add on weight. The bulk of the weight on any military vehicle is going to be the engine and machinery, the weapons, and the armor. As you add on weight, you need a more powerful engine to compensate for it. As you add on a more powerful engine, weight increases again. Its a never-ending chain. Normally engineers find the point at which everything is balanced and work with that, but you are dealing with mechs. These things would already need enormous energy sources and mechanical power to move, with a high center of gravity to boot. A good portion of that energy would go towards keeping the mech upright; we already have an insane amount of trouble with bipedal robots in the lab. I doubt there is really a balanced point on a mech at all.
The movement of the limbs would be carried out by mechanical or pneumatic movement. The amount of energy to move a limb would be insane for a heavily armored mech, especially at the speeds needed on a battlefield. Trying to armor the joints themselves would be hell, because one well placed grenade or RPG could completely disable a leg, rendering the entire mech useless. Said RPG could also just hit the upper chest and knock the entire mech over, making it extremely vulnerable.
Plus, making these things fly is next to impossible with all that weight. The amount of liquid fuel you would need would make the mech so cumbersome that a single bullet from the handgun of a drunkard could make the entire vehicle go up in flames.
I could go on, but you probably get the picture.
Mechs are inefficient. They have low mobility and are really just heavily armored troopers. They are based on human physiology which is already inefficient. Do I think they will be implemented in war or the military? Maybe, but probably not much more than utility or for show. A squad of marines could easily surround such a creation and sabotage it in seconds, taking advantage of the low maneuverability. Or, you could just pick it off with an A2S or S2S missile. Even a lone tank is vastly superior to any mech we could make in the next 100 or so years.
A little off topic, but do you know what I really want to see our militaries develop in the next 100 years? Bolos. Those motherfuckers could tear anybody and anything a new one. They would be a hell of a lot more fun to pilot than any mech, for sure. Oh, and kudos to those who actually know what a Bolo is and have read Keith Laumer's works.
Now to address everyone else.
OP, you are as paranoid as fuck. Just get over the fact that as humans we like to kill each other, and you'll live a much calmer and relaxed life. Also, do a little bit of research for crying out loud.
After reading the other posts, I'm glad others are sane. And I was going to have a blast of fun and retort everyone. Shame. I guess I'll address the incompetent posts.
Qrast wrote...
We can't ruled out the possibility of mecha in the battlefield. Todays technology are getting old it's no better than those technology that we once say imperfect as long these mecha haven't been use in real combat it's to early to ruled out this technology.Actually, yes we can. Its called the design cycle. All technology must work on paper and in idea first, then it must work in computer simulations, then it must work in the lab, and THEN you can test the prototype on a mock battlefield. As we are doing here, we are ruling out mechs at the idea stage because of their sheer impracticality. And where are you pulling that this bullshit that our technology is getting old? Compared to what? The technology that we have today is the medium of comparison. Your post makes no sense.
LustfulAngel wrote...
But I think Zoids are truly feasible, they can't be that much larger than your average tank or require that much more power. Nope. The main issue with mechs is, as I've already said, is that they are based on our inefficient human physiology.
Lets start at the beginning. The whole point of a mech is that it is an armored shell; it has to protect the squishy human inside while dealing as much damage as possible. Thus, it has to be heavily armored, with a cockpit designed to withstand high kinetic blasts and energies. As you add on armor, you add on weight. The bulk of the weight on any military vehicle is going to be the engine and machinery, the weapons, and the armor. As you add on weight, you need a more powerful engine to compensate for it. As you add on a more powerful engine, weight increases again. Its a never-ending chain. Normally engineers find the point at which everything is balanced and work with that, but you are dealing with mechs. These things would already need enormous energy sources and mechanical power to move, with a high center of gravity to boot. A good portion of that energy would go towards keeping the mech upright; we already have an insane amount of trouble with bipedal robots in the lab. I doubt there is really a balanced point on a mech at all.
The movement of the limbs would be carried out by mechanical or pneumatic movement. The amount of energy to move a limb would be insane for a heavily armored mech, especially at the speeds needed on a battlefield. Trying to armor the joints themselves would be hell, because one well placed grenade or RPG could completely disable a leg, rendering the entire mech useless. Said RPG could also just hit the upper chest and knock the entire mech over, making it extremely vulnerable.
Plus, making these things fly is next to impossible with all that weight. The amount of liquid fuel you would need would make the mech so cumbersome that a single bullet from the handgun of a drunkard could make the entire vehicle go up in flames.
I could go on, but you probably get the picture.
0
Giant bots 'a la Gundam' that can be spotted from miles away with beyond visual range radar/weapons is like painting a giant 'shoot me' sign on yourself
Though the more realistic option with current day technology would be powered exo-skeletons to reduce the burden on troops and possibly carry heavier weapons into the combat zone. I think the world of Ghost in the Shell would be where we are headed maybe less spider tanks though.
Though the more realistic option with current day technology would be powered exo-skeletons to reduce the burden on troops and possibly carry heavier weapons into the combat zone. I think the world of Ghost in the Shell would be where we are headed maybe less spider tanks though.
0
I think they will be used to do odd jobs like clean up garbage on the streets.
Tanks are much more easy to use and manufacture, and they camouflage easier.
Kuratas are just too oddly shaped to use for war.
Tanks are much more easy to use and manufacture, and they camouflage easier.
Kuratas are just too oddly shaped to use for war.
-2
I don't know bout any new tech on America, but i got plenty top secret information on the technology currently held by the Republik of China and Russia. Believe me when i say they has surpass us in term of military technology they have .
-1
METAL GEAR!?
Mechs are useless for ground battle. Just look at those robot camels from Star Wars. Human legs are not the best tools for mobility and human arms are not the most agile. Also a standing robot is a very big and easy target for a tank. Unless it's being used as some sort of power armor, I don't really see any practical roles for giant mechs.
Also despite me shouting Metal Gear at the beginning, it really looks like an armored core.
Mechs are useless for ground battle. Just look at those robot camels from Star Wars. Human legs are not the best tools for mobility and human arms are not the most agile. Also a standing robot is a very big and easy target for a tank. Unless it's being used as some sort of power armor, I don't really see any practical roles for giant mechs.
Also despite me shouting Metal Gear at the beginning, it really looks like an armored core.
0
Are u saying that robot camel are useless? think again...
As far as i know those camel have long legs right? then that prevent other foot soldier to climb up. Correct me if i'm wrong a high altitude can give you a wide range of view plus a canon of high caliber that mounted on those camel can topple up a base from afar.
About the info that i have about those military technology that currently being held by China and Russian is true. They managed to turn A DREAM into a reality (not a dream like dream in sleep), i cannot say what it is right now (just don't know the name yet) but they do have it. They will use all their power to deny it but it is still there. It's not an exoskeleton nor any standard weapon that we have but an entirely different category of weapon. It's not a Bomb nor it's robot I not really sure what to call it but It's awesome.
Really it's Awesome.
As far as i know those camel have long legs right? then that prevent other foot soldier to climb up. Correct me if i'm wrong a high altitude can give you a wide range of view plus a canon of high caliber that mounted on those camel can topple up a base from afar.
About the info that i have about those military technology that currently being held by China and Russian is true. They managed to turn A DREAM into a reality (not a dream like dream in sleep), i cannot say what it is right now (just don't know the name yet) but they do have it. They will use all their power to deny it but it is still there. It's not an exoskeleton nor any standard weapon that we have but an entirely different category of weapon. It's not a Bomb nor it's robot I not really sure what to call it but It's awesome.
Really it's Awesome.
0
Qrast wrote...
Are u saying that robot camel are useless? think again...As far as i know those camel have long legs right? then that prevent other foot soldier to climb up. Correct me if i'm wrong a high altitude can give you a wide range of view plus a canon of high caliber that mounted on those camel can topple up a base from afar.
About the info that i have about those military technology that currently being held by China and Russian is true. They managed to turn A DREAM into a reality (not a dream like dream in sleep), i cannot say what it is right now (just don't know the name yet) but they do have it. They will use all their power to deny it but it is still there. It's not an exoskeleton nor any standard weapon that we have but an entirely different category of weapon. It's not a Bomb nor it's robot I not really sure what to call it but It's awesome.
Really it's Awesome.
Yes robot camels are quite useless. They are perfect targets for tanks and they don't have enough mobility to avoid shots.
