R3v3ng3r wrote...
“They are preserving the sanctity of marriage, so that two gay men who've been together for twenty-five years can't get married, but a guy can still get drunk in Vegas and marry a hooker at the Elvis chapel! The sanctity of marriage is saved!”
This is the biggest problem with the whole "no gay marriage" position - if you want gay marriage banned, you pretty much have to want divorce banned, too, because they both pervert the "sanctity" of marriage. Unfortunately, I never hear that brought up in conversations between the big-wigs on both sides of the issue.
I watched a Dr. Phil episode today about gay marriage. (I hate Dr. Phil, but the subject interested me, and thankfully, Dr. Phil said next to nothing.) A good point was brought up that made everything clear to me. The side against gay marriage was saying that California had already voted democratically to prohibit gay marriage and that should be respected, and someone on the side of gay marriage said that in the past, the majority of Americans also voted to make interracial marriage illegal. The government ignored what the majority thought and made interracial marriages legal, because it was the right thing to do. The same thing should happen with gay marriage, and I don't just mean, "They should do it." I mean, it probably will happen in the future. I don't know how far in the future, but hopefully sometime in the next twenty years, or sooner. When gay marriage is made legal all across the country, and people everywhere take the sticks out of their asses, gay marriage will become a simple thing, just like interracial marriages are nowadays.