zellmer wrote...
Depends on what constitutes for "action against illegal downloads" in most cases, but generally, yes.
People getting fined for "only" downloading thousands of songs or downloading games and the like should happen more often then it does.
All the "I just want to try it before I buy it" or "I sometimes buy it after I dl it" type stuff is just an attempt to make them feel that they're justified doing it..
Regarding the last point of yours, it is not only an attempt, it is actually a logical consequence of selling games at high prices.
As someone already mentioned, it is like taking a look at a car, house, bike, and about any other object you usually buy to see if it is worth it. There are things the companies could do to counter that, from releasing a time limited version to a demo version with limited content, but it doesn't happen that often anymore these days.
I guess the concept of piracy is relatively broad. For one piracy is downloading a song / movie / game that he can't get in his country, because it is not released, for others piracy is downloading things causally when they are not sure that they are worth the money and than there are those that consider only large scale downloading as piracy like you described it.
In my opinion there should be a law that any company that is releasing a game, program etc should give the user let's say 4-10 hours of trial time depending on the price and the size of the content of the software, after that it is fair to hammer down anyone that is trying to illegally extend that period without buying the program.
Until that happens, I say "no thanks" to anyone watching what I am downloading, because honestly, I am not going to spend up to a few hundred euro, to find out that what I bought is crap and belongs in the recycle bin.