varem wrote...
Please explain how what I said is a completely different topic. I'm sure it will be rather humorous. You say that you mention nothing else about Africa, yet you consistently cite "less developed countries" in your post. Did I miss something or are the impoverished nations of Africa no longer part of "less developed countries"? I know semantics are tricky, but perhaps my language skills are not as superb as yours and I am missing something here. Also, keep in mind that I never suggested you help anyone; I was merely supporting my point. Then again, you seem to be much more apt than me at both reading and discussion, please feel free to correct me.
I made a topic about whether the poverty in America could be compared to the poverty in other places, and yes, I used Africa as an example.
You then bitched about people saying they cared about the problems in Africa when they really didn't. You said that if people really cared, they would join the Peace Corp or donate to charity. You then compared me to Helen Lovejoy from
The Simpsons and referenced her oft-said line, "Won't somebody please think of the children?"
Now, how are those two things the same?
I didn't make this topic to discuss the problems in Africa, nor to examine what the poor in Africa face. It's like tazpup says:
tazpup wrote...
There is nothing wrong with making a comparison to make a point clearer. It doesn't mean that you give a damn about the thing you are comparing or contrasting yourself to, it just means that it was something that people could easily imagine. Comparing one country to another is natural; this type of problem is typical only to humans; if an animal is poor it means he's dead, and he doesn't have a government to help him through it.
That there are starving people in Africa is something that everyone can imagine and accept, so I used it as an example of extreme poverty. Nothing more. How you got "We need to help the children in Africa!" from "Poverty in Africa means starving to death," I honestly do not know.