Darkstonedeity4 wrote...
Well, I'm surprised that nobody would do nothing.
Aside from that, no, I probably wouldn't help them. They made a choice, it's their responsibility to man up to it and accept whatever consequences come. And if they end up mugged/dead, yeah that's a tragedy, but it's just Social Darwinism at its finest.
Keep in mind the situation.
A FRIEND tries to go home drunk...
Most human beings consider friends to be worth keeping around, so would likely try to stop a friend from potentially killing himself. THAT is why the responses so far aren't "I wouldn't do anything."
To answer the question (there are actually two in this case):
1)
a) If it were within my power, I wouldn't let anyone drive home drunk, friend or not. Driving home drunk not only endangers the person, but everyone else on the road as well, which might include _me_. Walking home is a less dangerous, but the principle still apples.
b) A friend I will try my best to convince not to go. Depending on the level of drunkness (and my fondness of the guy), I might even physically restrain him. A stranger, on the other hand, I won't go as far. Drunks are notoriously hard to reason with, and a violent drunk is just dangerous. On the other hand, I'm willing to put up with a violent drunk friend.
In the occasional times that this situation came up in real life (one of my friends got drunk in a party, had a fight with another girl, had to go home), I drove the girl home. If someone I actually loved tried to walk home drunk and there's no way I can accompany them I'll fucking lock her up in some room (and occasionally makes sure she's still breathing).
2)
Is doing nothing the same as doing the wrong thing? A while back, there was a thread on another fourm where a guy fell into train tracks and another guy jumped down to save him. Quite a number of people wouldn't, especially if the train was fast approaching. Is not jumping to save the man the same as killing him with bare hands? Of course not. Risking your life to save another is commendable, but not risking your life doesn't mean you're an evil apathetic sonofabitch. In that thread, one poster said that anyone who _didn't_ try to save the guy was as guilty as pushing him down the tracks. Seriously, what? No, pushing the guy down the track (the wrong thing) is definitely not the same as not not risking my life to save him.
Personally I find this saying annoying: "All it takes for evil to win is for good men to do nothing." Seriously, no. Sometimes doing nothing is the only thing you can do, and sometimes it is the correct thing.