Hello folks i have noticed that the munimum age of fakku is in error (this is 18+)
Unlike lu.scio.us here its 18 (by usa laws)
lu.scio.us is also an us site
what is the reason of this (and does it count in the eu) {ps, im never banned of bein under age}
some messages about underage of lu.scio.us that prove i'm right (everyting is copyd pasted in order from the pages)
banned people there
-------------------------
"So you're 15, then? (Come on, what else is the 95 in your SN supposed to mean?) Still too young.
Convince me you're of legal age and I'll unban you. Otherwise, sayonara."
-----------------
Originally Posted by Humanious
Arh I will do that. And I am sure she can be convinced not to log in when is she old enough? Is it 16?-
If you know local laws on the issue, you should be able to figure out the date yourself. If you're in the US, it's probably no later than her 16th birthday. (A few places require you to be 18, though.) Otherwise, I wouldn't have a clue, but it's probably something you could look up somewhat readily.
-------------------------
Undeadcat95 has been banned from the Gallery for being underage. From Sweden, the legal age of consent is 15, this fellow is 14. I'd like to request a forum ban as well, please. Latsss, you will remain banned, I warned you, and you continued, so now you pay the price.
-------------------------
Incorrect, age of consent varies in the US, from 16 to 18, depending on the State in question.
You're thinking of the participation in pornography section, which is 18, but considering we're dealing with fictional characters the term "participation" isn't exactly appropriate. (Plus there's the issue of where the servers are located (no idea where that is btw), seeing how that nation's laws would be applicable.)
(Also, one can validly question if said law would hold up in court in a situation where a 16 or 17y old is married to an 18y old and they film themselves having sex, whether it should constitute child porn, considering a) they're of legal age (course also dependent upon the state in question), b) that they're of marriageable age and married to one and other. Could very well end up another Loving vs Virginia/Perez v. Sharp/Lawrence v. Texas. But that's another issue.)