New World Order and You

I wonder how many of you have heard of New World Order which have been "secretly" going on on America.

New World Order is a program to get all countries to become one, so it would be easier to control all kind of things on the world, such as education, saving earth from disasters and stuff like that. But in the New World Order program there's said that ~80% of human population on earth must be killed in order to achieve this.

If none of you have watched Alex Jones or heard, there's secretly poisoning foods in america to get people poisoned and they would die, also hospitals are trying to give vaccines what are actually in fact really poisonous for human body, giving somekind of dangerous illness with what people would die silently.

Also NWO's actions are being covered with news such as Michael Jackson's death.
Also theres somekind of method where they look which people will be let live and which will be killed, Blue, Red and Green list (click for Youtube Video).

Sorry im not so good in writing and speaking when it comes political stuff and like that so if you're interested to hear more you should check Alex Jones site and Youtube channel for more stuff. He is a real speaker, Alex knows the stuff for what i've watched his vids.




Feel free to complain or anything you have in mind =P
I believe in this stuff and i'd just want to share this with you people ^^
I hope nothing will happen to any of you. Feel free to post more links considering this stuff (and 2012).

~ Arbitor

The problem with this guy, is that he forms a conclusion, then he finds any little puzzle piece to fit that conclusion and ignores the evidence to the contrary. That's the wrong way to do shit.

But maybe that's the new way. Instead of starting with a question and looking for an answer why don't we start with a solution and find the question.

This will never happen. The basis of this idea is that people can get along. They can't. And as for killing people, you could probably get a good 100 million before something seemed strange but then people would realize, rise up and kill everyone involved.

Silly.

That's like saying, "I think you are a child rapist. You're under arrest while we search for you victims".



Humanity CAN come together. We just need either an extra-terrestrial threat, or someone with enough brains and firepower to conquer the globe.

People can be together but it is gonna take time for that to probably even start, (There are a few examples out there right now but, I'll let others point some of them out if they want. [Will the violence ever end?]) we are people afterall. The words Peace and War exist for good reason.

Right now I'm learning how to professionally critique and examine an essay in my after school English class, but the method of doing so is very similar too critiquing pretty much anything that can be evaluated and what RBZ said is very true the person makes this conclusion with nothing solid to support his theory.

Invalid Facts = Weak Theory

BUT a utopia does sound very nice.

I don't doubt there is a plan for a New World Order. It's inevitable that it would be tried out, especially within this day and age where the world becomes smaller and smaller. But I doubt the methods you claim are being used to create this outcome...

There's a problem with that plan, no one will sit idly and let that some prick decide that they must die for greater good.

Their response is that prick must die for their greater good.

This has only heighten my auspiciousness of any one world advertisement I'd make sure to stock up on automatic weapons.. I don't know, mass killing isn't cool at all.

That means you'll be killing my mangakuns that make cool mangas that I like to read too.

It wouldn't be possible for a single person or group to suddenly take control over night. There is a growing movement towards Global Citizenship. This is when a N.W.O style government would begin to take shape. Beginning signs would be requiring governments to disband their individual militarizes or turn control of them over to a governing body such as the United Nations. Along with legislation that trumps national laws in a similar way the supreme court trumps lower courts. An example of this would be gun bans made by the United Nations trumping the right to bear arms in the American constitution. That's the theory anyways.

At least, that's how I believe they would do it. High-jack a popular movement.

On topic: Utter rubbish. Conclusion comes last, not first.

From what I can recall the Georgia Guide stones were supposed to be a guide of what to do after the end of the world. I don't really know, ZiggyOtaku was more interested in it than I was. If case anybody cares here are the Rules on the Georgia Guide stones



I will admit that I laughed at the "genetically modified food" conspiracy. Somehow by breeding plants in the same manner as we do animals to receive traits we desire from the offspring is somehow going to control our reproduction in some manner.

It's not even the greater good, since 80% of the world is involved. It's more like "die for the elitist few".

I suppose reducing the population to 1 billion would be for the greater good for the environment but technically how can we expect 20% of the population would handle 100% of the infrastructure? Sounds like a failure.
A progressive diminution of the population by reducing fertility would be much more easier to plan and to conceal.

Oh wait, I wasn't supposed to give my solution?

I'm probably one of those going to be invited in NWO. I think though, there are more Christians than NWO members, they got the most members.

Anyway if we consider in the end everybody die being in the 20% is not so important.

Okay the problem with an approach such as this is that there is always a starting or later developed guide-line to those deemed disposable, and over time in this NWO style of living the rules will become more and more strict, thus leading to a faster dissolution of said order.

For example, if we killed all people deemed "stupid", then we would live fine for a time, then those once deemed smart would become the stupid and be killed, then the advanced, then even the smartest of us because of the ever-growing elitist ideas behind it.

I really can't understand how people get to have such ways of thinking ...
I mean, I hope everyone knows that this won't work, that this just can't work.

You can always try to reduce population for a better "control", as long as humans are all different, it's doomed to failure. Humans are all born differents, and this will almost every time lead to human feelings like jealousy, because the other one always got something better than you. You'll ever try to get more than the others, here again, it's human nature, greed.

Well, I think anyone can find an objection to every of their arguments. Let them think in this utopia if they want, but if they really attempt to do stupid things as killing random people ... Jail thoses psychopaths.

That is the world I want to live in. But again, it will never happen. Humans just love to hate too much.

Well the hate wells up from desire, and the desire to prove yourself better than the man next to you leads to progress. In a world where there was no conflict or greed or hate we'd be stuck in a constant present. We would never push forward because there is no reason to.

Imperfect beings can't live in a perfect world. It is a waste of time to achieve perfection in anything as it will be impossible. There are noble aspects to these rules but, they also lead to areas where freedom is restricted such as the maintaining the size of the human population. What would somebody do if they get 500,000,001+ people on the planet? Kill the newborn or kill an older person? The only alternative I can conceive is to strictly control the reproduction of everyone on the planet.Such events would grant too much power to those in authority since they would control the very reproduction of a species which is what Hitler did with the "Master Race" as the gentlemen in the video pointed out.
This reminds me of the events in TTGL.

Countries that have little problems with economy, security, equality etc etc have low birthrates, there's a few exceptions due special cases like china and effects of religion but if you look at a list (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_and_territories_by_fertility_rate) you'll get the point if you try to figure out what the difference is between the countries that have a high and low birthrate. So if you got a decent society you probably wouldn't run in such problems.

I don't know where they got the 500,000,000 number from but the ideal pop from ecologists would be somewhere between 1-3billions depending on what standard you'd want people to have and then the population ( or standard) could increase as technology gets better.