oddmandella wrote...
darksynchro21 wrote...
This doesn't sit well with me. I was always of the opinion that standardized testing isn't the best way to go in terms of education. Why? Because all this really does is represent the student (the person) as numbers and letters. That doesn't show who they are on the inside, nor does it show what they currently know on the subject. It only says that on a certain date, this person got this grade on a test. Yet the school system insists on these scores being very important.
Well on to the topic at hand: This will not sit well with the people in America. I can also predict that because of this (~3 hour) increase in school time, you will see a lot more students cutting classes and increasing apathy in the general student population.
Edit: I fully read the OP and I have to say that as long as the school administration includes a huge variety of clubs in which people would be able to choose from, and also the opportunity for new clubs to be created, then why not go for mandatory clubbing?
(last part) That's why I say the schools I went to sucked balls.
(second part) also I honestly think that would be for the first couple years, but for the long run that will be for the best
(first part)I understand that arguement, because people have bad days especially considering we're talking about pre/teenagers, but that would have helped me becuse I would finish in the top 90 percentile in my state but still have a D avg
RE:
Last part - I am pretty much supporting your idea on extracurricular activities, and lets face it: most schools (at least in America) aren't very club extensive.
Second part - The cutting may of course decrease, or it may not.... this can be argued back and forth. Though the main point of that statement was the creation of apathy. All of these school related problems (apathy, rising stress levels, suicide etc. would only be more intensified by more work and more specifically, less rest.
First part - In terms of a system, standardized testing should at most be only one (and certainly not the most important) aspect out of many that decide how academically fit a person is. So are you saying that standardized tests would have helped you in the long run (I couldn't understand your last sentence)?