TakeshiSagara wrote...
The difference i see between Pansexuality and Bisexuality is that, Men or Women who say they are Bisexual have a border line of them not being able to be sexually aroused to anything other than a human being. Pansexual people seem to be able to be aroused by anything that may crawl.
I, like the OP said, can't fathom how such a sexual connection can be made with anything outside our species.
What? I don't think Tsurayu said anything that involved inter-species mating.
Tsurayu wrote...
2. Pansexuals deny the concepts of only two genders, as Pansexuals are open to relationships with individuals who do not identify themselves as male or female.
How can one deny the "concept" of two genders? That's impossible. Yes, I understand that they are more specifically referring to those people with gender crisis or the transsexual community at large. But that isn't really the point. Whether you identify yourself by what is in between your legs (or the lack thereof) is irrelevant to what gender you really are. You can have an emotional state that differs, but you are a gender. Saying otherwise just seems like some run-of-the-mill political statement to me.
It's the idea of accepting the fact that there are people out there who don't consider themselves male or female, when really your sexuality and 'how you feel' shouldn't involve what is actually between your legs and what's on your birth certificate.
Like I said, to me Pansexual is just a snooty way of calling yourself a "Bisexual"
The difference between "cashier" and "Customer service specialist"