Coco-tan wrote...
Ethil wrote...
WALL OF FUCKING TEXT!!
There is a lot of talk about whether violent video games and movies can cause the child to be violent. This is actually not totally untrue, but that is not the fault of the games but of the parents lack of communicating with the child, explaining and showing how the real world works and help them be able to separate fiction from reality. When a child grows up it learns how to act from th influences around it; mostly its parents, but also from friends, teachers and other grown ups, but also from other things that show them a version of how the world works; movies, books, video games etc.
Now, the fact that people panic over this and think that playing GTA will make you kid a bully in school and then a violent criminal when he grows up is retarded. A human child Can reason and think logically, and if it is brought up with love, told and shown how a good person acts, that will have a much greater impact on the child than any video game. Something that is good is to actually follow the Age Regulations on movies/games until a child is mature enough not to be too influenced and affected by the content of the media. Not telling to force your child to watch teletubbies until he/she's 18 (damn, that'd probably make it a psychopath if anything), but letting it play RapeLay at the age of 5 isn't a really good idea either.
Point being; what you teach your child, and if you do it in a proper way will have a much larger impact on its behavior and reasoning when it grows up than any video game.
You act like the majority of the adult populace in AMERICA (mind you), are now capable of parenting like how our parents did and what their parents did prior. Kids can walk around with a I-Phone in one hand and their parent’s imaginary leash in the other as they bitch about what they don’t have now-a-days. These parents have kids when their brains can’t even comprehend the logical way of parenting (i.e. “I would never parent like my dad or mom would”, “I am not my dad or mother when it comes to my adulthood”) Naturally, they would like to treat their kids like mini adults and have those kids spit on them like trash. Explain to me how that populace is capable of parenting? They could give two shits if their kids are playing GTA yet when they FINALLY see the gameplay, they bitch. Whose money bought that game?
I have never been hit by my parents. It might be since it is against the law where I am from, but more likely it is because they think it is wrong. Not being hit by them have most likely not made me more stupid, nor more intelligent. That is just superstition, and a truly retarded one. Nor have I been pampered or gotten everything I pointed at; with a family of 6, with 2 older siblings, most of my stuff was handed down to me, and having a younger brother that required more care than me when I grew up a little probably helped me in learning how to care for myself. My parents has been angry with me, and I have done stupid stuff as I grew up, getting yelled at and punished in a way that taught me what I should and should not do, but they have, as I said, Never resorted to physical punishment.
If you think you need to hit your child for it to "learn and be brought up in a proper way", then I pity you. Clearly your parent could not show you what was right or wrong or how to take care of yourself since they did not have the intelligence to do so and had to resort to violence. Or maybe they were just lazy, but that is all the same. Some of you might think that violence helps to give you the respect you need to have for you parents, but I think that you are confusing respect with the fear of getting hit. That is Not the same thing. Also, mutual respect is an important factor in raising a child, and hitting someone that is so helpless as a small child is disgusting. To be honest, if I had been hit as a child, I would have hit them back.
>I have never been hit by my parents
>They think it is wrong
Which projected onto you. †˜cause if a kid was screaming at the top of their lungs in a public, throwing merchandise, acting like a total shithead despite you calmly telling them to stop, you’d totally keep on going and not spank them right? Sure, you could take them outside but good luck dragging them out when they’re flailing. Spanking put fear into the child but that fear was disciplinary. It’s not a smack across the face that leaves a bruise mark. It’s a simple slap on the ass. The kid will take it seriously but if you encourage their discipline with half spankings and half hugs, reassuring that you don’t hate them, then they will be FINE.
Also, bro, if you were five and you loved you parents...and they spanked you, you wouldn’t be able to comprehend to “hit them back”.
I can't see why anyone would want their child to call them ma'am, but I do not think that is something anyone should consider a problem, since it does not matter. It is good to be able to call someone in a respectful way at any rate. I want my children to call me Dad, but that is just my preference.
Also, about the Wii thing, are you sure the parents did not give him their money and just let him pay for the game to teach him how to pay in a store? Sounds likely to me.
Some of the kids I knew growing up called FEMALE STRANGERS “ma’am” and MALE STRANGERS “sir”. It’s teaching the kid respect towards acquaintances instead of saying the opposite and being projected as rude.
Also silly. Life is a contest. There are losers and there are winners. Sometimes it matters, mostly it don't. To teach your child not to take a loss too hard is also the duty of a parent, and the same goes for teaching it to be modest even if it wins.
Sometimes is not the parent’s fault. Blame the soccer moms and piss-nancy dad coaches who want everyone to win and not feel bullied. Next.
Stress is bad, that is self-explanatory. Some stress might help you preform better, but too much will disrupt everything in your life, and as a child, this might also follow you when you grow up.
Already talked about hitting a child, it is unnecessary and stupid, and makes me question if you are really fit to be a parent at all. There are much better ways to teach your children respect.
"Hyper" is something many children are and should be, that is a part of being a child, having the energy to run around doing fun stuff. I'm a computer nerd, but I actually do think that children should play more outside, run around and be crazy.
Then ofc, "hyper" can also mean ADHD or summin like that, which makes the child having problems with concentration etc.
Red ink doesn’t do shit. Again, soccer moms who want everyone to win at life want their sensitive children to not feel threatened. The pen and ink is a TOOL. How you use that tool or take in the idea of that tool will make you project a certain emotion about it. Got a F on your test? You need to study. It is your duty to ask for help, to get a tutor or ask your parents and/or figure out what’s wrong. Younger kids don’t understand this but teachers do go over tests, quizzes and homework over here. There is no excuse, unless the kid is unsure or has a learning disability, that they can’t figure out what’s wrong.
I agree that many children now days are to pampered and do not learn the stuff that they need to succeed in life and to be able to live by themselves, have a family, a job etc. Parents are doing a bad job in preparing their children for the future. Yes, I agree with you, so I will just say some things I concluded after typing all this.
I think children should be allowed to be children for as long as possible. That does not mean that they should be allowed to go crazy, be disrespectful against their surroundings and all, but that they should be allowed to play as much as they need.
Parents should not resort to violence to teach their children respect, there are other ways that works much better. The "Stick and the Carrot" is a method that always works, on everything =) But a child should as I said be allowed to be a child and should not be forced down with rules and stuff like that either. Moderation is always best.
To teach a child how the real world works, do not leave it on its own to get impressions from all and everything that does not display a accurate reality. Do not either be afraid to let them imagine, forbidding them to play games and see violent movies will most likely only make it harder for them to handle some situations in the future. rules should be taught so that they are respected, not forced down their throat.
>"hyper" can also mean ADHD or summin like that, which makes the child having problems with concentration etc.
Which is not okay. When you’re in a classroom and are teaching a child, the last thing you want is that one kid to be jumping around or asking off-topic questions. This happens in elementary levels, sure, but in middle, junior and high school levels, it’s unacceptable. It’s a behavioral problem. A kid can be as free as they want but in a institution like school, doctor’s office, where ever - they need to learn to sit still, keep quiet and listen.
Children can have the capability to be children but you can’t allow them to go on and on as children. No discipline like teaching manners, yelling at the kid for doing something wrong or to warn them about their dangerous actions, etc. will make the kid grow up into either a man-child, overly sensitive or a delinquent.
So, basically, your hippie way of discipline only applies to kids who don’t have any flaws. All children have tantrums, are delinquents, but to a certain degree. Spanking or yelling at your kid as a warning is not abuse. Smacking them so hard that they bleed is abuse. Intentionally not feeding them is abuse. Whipping them with a belt is abuse. I think people forget what real abuse is.
I'm not getting what you are saying here, since you are mostly saying what I already said and agreed with...
Seems like for example think I said that you should give the kid a pat on their head and just say "it's ok honey" when they do something wrong, while I'm actually just saying that it is wrong to discipline a child with physical violence.
Most of the time you agree with me, but in the end you make it seem like I said the opposite thing?
Also sis, no matter what age I was, if someone hit me I'd bite, hit and kick back all I could, whether I loved them or not. Making me realize when I was wrong by telling me and giving me a sense of guilt was far more effective. "I'm not angry, I'm disappoint" always hurts more.