Fascistznik wrote...
The politicization of sexual repression, like in this case, is not a new trend .If this story has to have a beginning it would be in the age of pre-reformation when papal authority was at its peak. Back then sexual promiscuity was highly frowned upon due to being seen as a deviation from the churches "God given" rules and the ideas of freedom of thought and speech was deemed highly unfashionable. These ideologies then carry on unto the modern age and becomes an integral part of the western culture's views on sexuality. This scorn for sexual deviation and love for the suppression of thought was the packaged and shipped of by the European colonialist in the form of the Christian religion which soon found it's way into the hands of the unsuspecting Filipinos. Today the Philippines is one of the most westernized country in Asia, which is why our government is now so eager to jump the "BAN LOLI; PROTECT CHILDREN" political bandwagon that our western overlords are on. The government has also yet to question the validity of this policy. How can the decrease of depictions of a crime work to reduce instances of it? Policies like these only serve to create an illusion of lack of crime, specifically the sexual abuse of children which is the main agenda of the people who support this ban. Another argument of the bans supporters is that those who fap to loli porn are pedophiles in the making (first 2d then 3d is a brief summarization of this argument). But do we punish people for a crime they have yet to or might not even commit? Is it morally commendable to imprison people who play GTA because they may or may not bludgeon a hooker with a baseball bat? The answer to that is a two letter word that begins with an "n" and ends with an "o". If we are to give in to that kind of paranoia than we might as well imprison every man who has ever watch an action movie, because good lord knows what murderous desires fester inside those sick f*cks. Bans like these only serve to restrict freedom of speech, though I'm not saying that this is the beginning of our plummet to pre-reformation style thought suppression (that would be a slippery slope fallacy on my part).
Non-TL;DR summary: I blame uptight Christians and western culture for the ban and promote freedom of thought, speech, and lolis.
/pseudo-intellectual rant
You have gained my respect. +rep for you
And yes, it's because of uptight christians.
Anyone remember the "Aking Banana" song? I was just enjoying the music and its humorous tone and I never even had the thought that it had a double meaning.
Only Green-minded persons (In this discussion, The church, tbexact) can detect something remotely related to something sexual that wasn't even done on purpose