Hi softbanker, glad you didn't bother to read any of my posts in this thread.
softbanker wrote...
you find pleasure seeing women get hurt or rape 2d or 3d
I stated before that:
Gibbous wrote...
Personally, it disgusts me to no end, whether fictional or real.
Your allegation is in fact wrong and ridiculous. Pass a basic Snellen test, then we shall debate the issue again.
softbanker wrote...
This kinda thing really do happened in real life. Sometimes even victims bribe cops to return the favor to the criminal who done them wrong. Criminals like rapist are really bad persons. Think of the damage that it do to the victim. The agony and the pain of shame. Some victims even commit suicides.
And? That magically makes perverting the police force into a revenge force right?
No, it does not. The job of the police is to enforce laws, not to go on vendettas. An officer must understand that or resign.
Even more ridiculous is the point about bribes. How does that make anything magically alright? A corrupt cop must go, come hell or high water.
softbanker wrote...
Maybe the venveng have his reason why he like beating up bad guys.
Lets put it this way; you find pleasure seeing women get hurt or rape 2d or 3d, venveng find pleasure beating up criminals. His fetish is his fetish, you mind your own.
No, let's not. Do you comprehend the difference between people jerking it to cartoon rape and people beating others into a bloody mess?
One is a victimless crime, the other is not. One involves nobody getting hurt, the other clearly DOES involve people getting hurt.
If my fetish were to gas everyone with an IQ below room temperature, would you also want to be told "your fetish is your fetish and my fetish is mine" as I turn up the valve? I think not. Even though I'd "have my reason" for it, it doesn't make it right.
Murder is wrong, no matter whether it's someone's fetish; brutalizing others is wrong no matter whether it's someone's fetish.
discordia wrote...
By powerful you meant far fetched or is there some other criticism (maybe sarcasm) I missed?
I mean that your post holds (and always should) its water as is, and no quote would be necessary to reinforce the point made.