Running: the ultimate question

Long distance

in my country(yagshemash!) we have a saying: "hardlopers zijn doodlopers" which means something like runners run to death. if you use yourself too exessive you wear out is believe here. gravity is the biggest thing to wear your body out. if this theory is true, then srinting is better for you

Being able to sprint or run long distance depends on the individual.
I use to be able to sprint then that slowly changed to long distance when I hit high school. Learned how to pace myself.

What would running up walls and across rooftops count as? :?

I'm honestly a better sprinter than long-distance. But I'm working on long distance

running is not good for you. it is bad for you legs, and from the waist down it does not have any real benefits. running is good for your heart, yes, and it does have the benefits above the waist, but running adds unneeded stress to your body below. just saying.

Forty-two.

Yes because sitting in a chair forever is so much better for your health. Exercise actually helps to lengthen you life span, running has yet to be linked to serious problems in later life.

For me, running is all about long distance. I ran cross country in high school and got to the point where I was running 25-40 miles a week. I've slowed down a lot in a couple of years though. Now when I go for morning runs before class, my legs feel fine, but it's my upper body that can't keep up. :)

I personally run long-distance, always made more sense to me; longer distance = more exercise.

I only run on buses when I'm being late, so sprints do for me

I suggest a Nature themed place for Long Distances so you can enjoy.