Scientist Cure Cancer but...
-3
The World of People Who Think
Well, what did I say? What did I say?! I told y'all that the pharmaceutical industry is shady and here is proof.
The excuse here is that they can not patent the DCA method hence no patent no money(for their greedy asses).
Funny thing is that the drug itself does not require a patent.
The best thing about this drug is there are barely any side effects or long term effects.
Well I would love to see BigLundi play captain save a-ho to the rescue in the defense of these bastards now.
What you have to understand is that these corrupt mofos would risk the life of people buying products and services that do nothing but halt the problem for nothing more than a few hours. This cure would ruin their way of life and mostly mess up Americas economy.
The plot twist here is I do not care about the economy or people that are part of corporations who think they are to big to fail. Funny thing is that the Titanic was suppose to be so strong that even God could not sink it well...It seemed they pissed on God and God winked because we all know how that ended. Now mind you I do not care about some pagan douchebag who was suppose to have died for my sins on some damn lower case "t", it is the principles of the matter at hand.
These people are impostors, con men, and thieves that steal from people indirectly. I cannot stand people that lie and think they can get away with it regardless of their morality...
Oh and since everyone has such a hard-on for links here. I will give you more then you can ask for.
New Scientist
Cell
(Also I would like to point out that there have been plenty of different cures for this already however this one is the best solution as of yet...)
Pure DCA
Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Reversal with Dichloroacetate
MARIJUANA!!!(note I do no smoke it but I know medically that it is a miracle plant not a drug)That is a discussion for another time...
Well, what did I say? What did I say?! I told y'all that the pharmaceutical industry is shady and here is proof.
The excuse here is that they can not patent the DCA method hence no patent no money(for their greedy asses).
Funny thing is that the drug itself does not require a patent.
The best thing about this drug is there are barely any side effects or long term effects.
Well I would love to see BigLundi play captain save a-ho to the rescue in the defense of these bastards now.
What you have to understand is that these corrupt mofos would risk the life of people buying products and services that do nothing but halt the problem for nothing more than a few hours. This cure would ruin their way of life and mostly mess up Americas economy.
The plot twist here is I do not care about the economy or people that are part of corporations who think they are to big to fail. Funny thing is that the Titanic was suppose to be so strong that even God could not sink it well...It seemed they pissed on God and God winked because we all know how that ended. Now mind you I do not care about some pagan douchebag who was suppose to have died for my sins on some damn lower case "t", it is the principles of the matter at hand.
These people are impostors, con men, and thieves that steal from people indirectly. I cannot stand people that lie and think they can get away with it regardless of their morality...
Oh and since everyone has such a hard-on for links here. I will give you more then you can ask for.
New Scientist
Cell
(Also I would like to point out that there have been plenty of different cures for this already however this one is the best solution as of yet...)
Pure DCA
Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Reversal with Dichloroacetate
Spoiler:
MARIJUANA!!!(note I do no smoke it but I know medically that it is a miracle plant not a drug)That is a discussion for another time...
0
Funny, not a peer reviewed research paper in the bunch.
You'll excuse me while I read the fact that your very first source has someone cautioning people not to take this too seriously as there is quote "A lack of any large scale studies" and smile.
You'll excuse me while I read the fact that your very first source has someone cautioning people not to take this too seriously as there is quote "A lack of any large scale studies" and smile.
0
BigLundi wrote...
Funny, not a peer reviewed research paper in the bunch.You'll excuse me while I read the fact that your very first source has someone cautioning people not to take this too seriously as there is quote "A lack of any large scale studies" and smile.
Agreed their are many people who say that this is not right however nothing is set in stone and did you not see all the sources on the last link? At the same time of course their are no peer reviews this study is almost new. That along with the fact of the bunch of other cures the industry has not bothered to patent. Hell even the most DANGEROUS drug in America right now called marijuana(thats right cannibus is the most dangerous drug in America. In second place is cocaine...lol!) has properties that can heal and nullify cancer.
I know what you're saying however usually you put up links to discredit people...
Where's your links?
Well duh. there's more money in treatment than there is in a cure.
Watch the movie Iron Monkey and get back to me...
0
Wow something to cure cancer at an extreme rate.
How come the industries are not interested you ask?
Also why the news have no big coverage on it?
The industry needs the citizens to be kept sick. They take the drug the industry made and it lingers the effect for a few short hours and people need it to take it again.
As soon as this "Miracle" comes into peoples hands, they will get healed and they no longer need medicine from the pharmacy, which could mean a huge minus on their account.
Believe me, they have found ways to heal almost every sickness, it's just a big scam, because like the teaching from Islam said, "You believe The Creator has created a sickness without it's healing counterpart?"
Yin yang, good and bad, sick and health, black and white, that is the laws of the universe, for the bad to exist must also exist the good.
I believed that theory and I will keep believing till it's proven that it does not exist.
How come the industries are not interested you ask?
Also why the news have no big coverage on it?
The industry needs the citizens to be kept sick. They take the drug the industry made and it lingers the effect for a few short hours and people need it to take it again.
As soon as this "Miracle" comes into peoples hands, they will get healed and they no longer need medicine from the pharmacy, which could mean a huge minus on their account.
Believe me, they have found ways to heal almost every sickness, it's just a big scam, because like the teaching from Islam said, "You believe The Creator has created a sickness without it's healing counterpart?"
Yin yang, good and bad, sick and health, black and white, that is the laws of the universe, for the bad to exist must also exist the good.
I believed that theory and I will keep believing till it's proven that it does not exist.
0
Legendary_Dollci wrote...
Wow something to cure cancer at an extreme rate.How come the industries are not interested you ask?
Also why the news have no big coverage on it?
The industry needs the citizens to be kept sick. They take the drug the industry made and it lingers the effect for a few short hours and people need it to take it again.
As soon as this "Miracle" comes into peoples hands, they will get healed and they no longer need medicine from the pharmacy, which could mean a huge minus on their account.
Believe me, they have found ways to heal almost every sickness, it's just a big scam, because like the teaching from Islam said, "You believe The Creator has created a sickness without it's healing counterpart?"
Yin yang, good and bad, sick and health, black and white, that is the laws of the universe, for the bad to exist must also exist the good.
I believed that theory and I will keep believing till it's proven that it does not exist.
Be careful we don't want the Big "bad" Lundi to discredit your outlook on philosophy between the context of good and evil...Oh wait...
He did a topic on morality today or yesterday.
P.S. Big Lundi... Love how you deleted my post on your recent Serious Discussion topic...That or one of the supposed moderators did it...which I doubt.
0
BlackShogunFox wrote...
BigLundi wrote...
Funny, not a peer reviewed research paper in the bunch.You'll excuse me while I read the fact that your very first source has someone cautioning people not to take this too seriously as there is quote "A lack of any large scale studies" and smile.
Agreed their are many people who say that this is not right however nothing is set in stone and did you not see all the sources on the last link? At the same time of course their are no peer reviews this study is almost new. That along with the fact of the bunch of other cures the industry has not bothered to patent. Hell even the most DANGEROUS drug in America right now called marijuana has properties that can heal and nullify cancer.
I know what you're saying however usually you put up links to discredit people...
Where's you links?
I don't need links to discredit you...since you haven't provided any links in support of you. No credible links at least. The only link you gave that even held an inkling of actual scientific research was the last one, and all that was was an individual case study, which, if you talk to any expert on medicinal research, isn't at all reliable to establish the effectiveness of a 'cure'. Of course if you really want links, I'll give you links. None that discredit this particular treatment option(since you haven't provided any positive evidence in favor of it) But I'll go ahead and show you what REAL research into curing cancer looks like.
Integration of nutritional care into cancer treatment: need for improvement
Joly C, Jacqueline-Ravel N, Pugliesi-Rinaldi A, Bigler-Perrotin L, Chikhi M, Dietrich PY, Dulguerov P, Miralbell R, Picard-Kossovsky M, Seium Y, Thériault M, Pichard C.
Rev Med Suisse. 2011 Nov 16;7(317):2252-6. French
See, research isn't always so easy as a google search. Sometimes you have to look for pdf files, or look up magazines and articles.
And this one explains how when people try to conclude that any one thing can cure things like cancer, they're liable to make mistakes just on a fundamental basis.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22353928
Edit: What are you talking about? I can't delete your posts unless I'm a moderator, even if they're in my topic. The only people that can delete your posts are admins, mods, and...you.
1
BlackShogunFox wrote...
Well, what did I say? What did I say?! I told y'all that the pharmaceutical industry is shady and here is proof. Where is this proof?
I see no articles peer-reviewed articles in that link. FOr all I know some whackjob just wrote it.
http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2011/05/dichloroacetate_and_cancer.php
The simple summary is this: that claim is a lie.
The latter links are case reports. You cannot make a analysis with a sample size of 1. They are not studies on the efficiency of DCA.
As for DCA not being toxic?
http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/3434142?uid=3738824&uid=2129&uid=2&uid=70&uid=4&sid=55885754783
0
BlackShogunFox wrote...
Legendary_Dollci wrote...
Wow something to cure cancer at an extreme rate.How come the industries are not interested you ask?
Also why the news have no big coverage on it?
The industry needs the citizens to be kept sick. They take the drug the industry made and it lingers the effect for a few short hours and people need it to take it again.
As soon as this "Miracle" comes into peoples hands, they will get healed and they no longer need medicine from the pharmacy, which could mean a huge minus on their account.
Believe me, they have found ways to heal almost every sickness, it's just a big scam, because like the teaching from Islam said, "You believe The Creator has created a sickness without it's healing counterpart?"
Yin yang, good and bad, sick and health, black and white, that is the laws of the universe, for the bad to exist must also exist the good.
I believed that theory and I will keep believing till it's proven that it does not exist.
Be careful we don't want the Big "bad" Lundi to discredit that also...
P.S. Big Lundi... Love how you deleted my post on your recent Serious Discussion topic...That or one of the supposed moderators did it...which I doubt.
No discrediting here, what I wrote are facts that can be backed up by hundreds of articles, famous speeches, news from the internet, and even people who blew the whistle and later got shot or killed.
Example:
There was a scientist and also a mechanic engineer who built a water power based engine. Sure it wasn't that fast or could run for long, but it was possible to build and was better for the world.
That scientist or someone got shot after publicly announcing it and then they announced it that the project got canceled. Hmm funny.
0
Of COURSE there aren't peer-reviewed articles Lundi! I mean, with all the money Big Pharma is making off this kind of thing, they can pay the more mainstream sites to take lifesaving information like this off the sites. The advantage of having a smaller independent blog is that it's harder to financially pressure the blogger to remove this kind of info. And any scientists who would consider publishing studies on matters like these quickly have their careers ruined by their less-scrupulous colleagues for a bit of pharmaceutical money!
0
Legendary_Dollci wrote...
No discrediting here, what I wrote are facts that can be backed up by hundreds of articles, famous speeches, news from the internet, and even people who blew the whistle and later got shot or killed.
Really? Yin and Yang is a fact of the universe supported by science? The Quran is supported by science? I'm gonna need you to back that one up. ;)
Example:
There was a scientist and also a mechanic engineer who built a water power based engine. Sure it wasn't that fast or could run for long, but it was possible to build and was better for the world.
That scientist or someone got shot after publicly announcing it and then they announced it that the project got canceled. Hmm funny.
There was a scientist and also a mechanic engineer who built a water power based engine. Sure it wasn't that fast or could run for long, but it was possible to build and was better for the world.
That scientist or someone got shot after publicly announcing it and then they announced it that the project got canceled. Hmm funny.
Mm hmm, and I have an uncle who was a member of the CIA, and he got taken to Area 51 and saw the aliens the government are keeping from us.
Stories are fun, but without evidence, that's all they are.
0
BigLundi wrote...
Legendary_Dollci wrote...
No discrediting here, what I wrote are facts that can be backed up by hundreds of articles, famous speeches, news from the internet, and even people who blew the whistle and later got shot or killed.
Really? Yin and Yang is a fact of the universe supported by science? The Quran is supported by science? I'm gonna need you to back that one up. ;)
Example:
There was a scientist and also a mechanic engineer who built a water power based engine. Sure it wasn't that fast or could run for long, but it was possible to build and was better for the world.
That scientist or someone got shot after publicly announcing it and then they announced it that the project got canceled. Hmm funny.
There was a scientist and also a mechanic engineer who built a water power based engine. Sure it wasn't that fast or could run for long, but it was possible to build and was better for the world.
That scientist or someone got shot after publicly announcing it and then they announced it that the project got canceled. Hmm funny.
Mm hmm, and I have an uncle who was a member of the CIA, and he got taken to Area 51 and saw the aliens the government are keeping from us.
Stories are fun, but without evidence, that's all they are.
What I mean is the laws of the universe is of good and bad, which the Quran also states the same thing.
The story was mentioned on a thread before, just don't remember where it was posted.
But thanks for picking on me, even though I wasn't expecting that.
0
Legendary_Dollci wrote...
What I mean is the laws of the universe is of good and bad, which the Quran also states the same thing.
Well that's simple enough to rebut. The laws of the universe have nothing to do with good and bad.
Here, I'll let you try and point it out. Please point out the good and bad in the law of universal gravitation.
F=G[(m1xm2)/r^2]
The story was mentioned on a thread before, just don't remember where it was posted.
But thanks for picking on me, even though I wasn't expecting that.
But thanks for picking on me, even though I wasn't expecting that.
Mm hmm, I heard from a friend I can't remember the name of that his uncle was in the CIA and saw an alien at Area 51.
0
BigLundi wrote...
Legendary_Dollci wrote...
What I mean is the laws of the universe is of good and bad, which the Quran also states the same thing.
Well that's simple enough to rebut. The laws of the universe have nothing to do with good and bad.
Here, I'll let you try and point it out. Please point out the good and bad in the law of universal gravitation.
F=G[(m1xm2)/r^2]
The story was mentioned on a thread before, just don't remember where it was posted.
But thanks for picking on me, even though I wasn't expecting that.
But thanks for picking on me, even though I wasn't expecting that.
Mm hmm, I heard from a friend I can't remember the name of that his uncle was in the CIA and saw an alien at Area 51.
Well it's easy, Lundi! See, the law of universal gravitation starts with a G! Besides, he wasn't talking about PHYSICAL laws, man!
0
BigLundi wrote...
BlackShogunFox wrote...
BigLundi wrote...
Funny, not a peer reviewed research paper in the bunch.You'll excuse me while I read the fact that your very first source has someone cautioning people not to take this too seriously as there is quote "A lack of any large scale studies" and smile.
Agreed their are many people who say that this is not right however nothing is set in stone and did you not see all the sources on the last link? At the same time of course their are no peer reviews this study is almost new. That along with the fact of the bunch of other cures the industry has not bothered to patent. Hell even the most DANGEROUS drug in America right now called marijuana has properties that can heal and nullify cancer.
I know what you're saying however usually you put up links to discredit people...
Where's you links?
I don't need links to discredit you...since you haven't provided any links in support of you. No credible links at least. The only link you gave that even held an inkling of actual scientific research was the last one, and all that was was an individual case study, which, if you talk to any expert on medicinal research, isn't at all reliable to establish the effectiveness of a 'cure'. Of course if you really want links, I'll give you links. None that discredit this particular treatment option(since you haven't provided any positive evidence in favor of it) But I'll go ahead and show you what REAL research into curing cancer looks like.
Integration of nutritional care into cancer treatment: need for improvement
Joly C, Jacqueline-Ravel N, Pugliesi-Rinaldi A, Bigler-Perrotin L, Chikhi M, Dietrich PY, Dulguerov P, Miralbell R, Picard-Kossovsky M, Seium Y, Thériault M, Pichard C.
Rev Med Suisse. 2011 Nov 16;7(317):2252-6. French
See, research isn't always so easy as a google search. Sometimes you have to look for pdf files, or look up magazines and articles.
And this one explains how when people try to conclude that any one thing can cure things like cancer, they're liable to make mistakes just on a fundamental basis.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22353928
Edit: What are you talking about? I can't delete your posts unless I'm a moderator, even if they're in my topic. The only people that can delete your posts are admins, mods, and...you.
Hahahahaha...Did you say Google? I fuckin hate Google! That however is another subject/victim for another time and place.
Pdf files? What do I need with a portable document? Plus all the other crud you just mentioned.
I read that cute little link you put up...What is the expression "I hear the words but they don't mean shit..." Yeah that is it. I gave you a picture showing how to kill the cancer cells what do you give me? Nothing but long winded crap that goes into one ear and out the other. Give me a blue print on how it works. A picture is worth a thousand words. Way more than that article you put up.
At fatman: The fact that the DCA was not supported by the industry is proof they only care about money and they are in fact shady...Try again? Also, what point of little to no side effect or long term effects do you not understand. I know it is toxic I never said it wasn't...Try again with me!
At BigLundi: Oh is the pot trying to call the kettle black? Well all you put up is a story just like I did and Legendary did. So let me give you a card it is called "Havaseat Productions". All we put up on serious discussion is stories it is up to us to tell fact from opinion and truth from fiction...
0
BlackShogunFox wrote...
Hahahahaha...Did you say Google? I fuckin hate Google! That however is another subject/victim for another time and place.
Oh right, you're a conspiracy theorist, I should have figured.
Pdf files? What do I need with a portable document? Plus all the other crud you just mentioned.
Because that's where you'll find peer reviewed data.
I read that cute little link you put up...What is the expression "I hear the words but they don't mean shit..." Yeah that is it. I gave you a picture showing how to kill the cancer cells what do you give me? Nothing but long winded crap that goes into one ear and out the other. Give me a blue print on how it works. A picture is worth a thousand words. Way more than that article you put up.
I can draw a picture of me shooting a cancer cell with a laser beam. Your picture is worth nothing without the peer reviewed literature to back it up.
Also I think it's kind of funny that you admit that actual scientific articles just 'go in one ear and out the other'. You really don't care about the truth, do you?
At fatman: The fact that the DCA was not supported by the industry is proof they only care about money and they are in fact shady...Try again?
Really? So the pharmaceutical companies not supporting using a specific drug in a new way means, "They're all greedy bastards that are trying to milk all your money from you"? I have a better explanation: No scientific data actually supports the idea that this drug works as a cure for cancer, so nobody's endorsing it.
Also, what point of little to no side effect or long term effects do you not understand. I know it is toxic I never said it wasn't...Try again with me!
...wtf? "Little to no side effects! I know it's toxic, and I never said it wasn't!"
...Are you high?
At BigLundi: Oh is the pot trying to call the kettle black? Well all you put up is a story just like I did and Legendary did. So let me give you a card it is called "Havaseat Productions". All we put up on serious discussion is stories it is up to us to tell fact from opinion and truth from fiction...
Instead of simply 'deciding which stories are facts' how about we just rely on whatever 'stories' are backed up by evidence? I prefer that.
Everything we say is opinion. The difference is that I reserve judgement and keep my opinions informed on evidence...while you inform your opinions with personal bias and a desire to see what isn't there. That's pretty par for the course for you conspiracy theorists.
0
BigLundi wrote...
BlackShogunFox wrote...
Hahahahaha...Did you say Google? I fuckin hate Google! That however is another subject/victim for another time and place.
Oh right, you're a conspiracy theorist, I should have figured.
And you are an all-knowing-wannabe...
Pdf files? What do I need with a portable document? Plus all the other crud you just mentioned.
Because that's where you'll find peer reviewed data.
Like fatman said that could all just be data made by some whackjob.
I read that cute little link you put up...What is the expression "I hear the words but they don't mean shit..." Yeah that is it. I gave you a picture showing how to kill the cancer cells what do you give me? Nothing but long winded crap that goes into one ear and out the other. Give me a blue print on how it works. A picture is worth a thousand words. Way more than that article you put up.
I can draw a picture of me shooting a cancer cell with a laser beam. Your picture is worth nothing without the peer reviewed literature to back it up.
So do you have a picture or not?
Also I think it's kind of funny that you admit that actual scientific articles just 'go in one ear and out the other'. You really don't care about the truth, do you?
Neither do you...
At fatman: The fact that the DCA was not supported by the industry is proof they only care about money and they are in fact shady...Try again?
Really? So the pharmaceutical companies not supporting using a specific drug in a new way means, "They're all greedy bastards that are trying to milk all your money from you"? I have a better explanation: No scientific data actually supports the idea that this drug works as a cure for cancer, so nobody's endorsing it.
Ok...what about the other cures then?
Also, what point of little to no side effect or long term effects do you not understand. I know it is toxic I never said it wasn't...Try again with me!
...wtf? "Little to no side effects! I know it's toxic, and I never said it wasn't!"
...Are you high?
High on knowledge yes because everything under the sun is toxic in someway or another...
At BigLundi: Oh is the pot trying to call the kettle black? Well all you put up is a story just like I did and Legendary did. So let me give you a card it is called "Havaseat Productions". All we put up on serious discussion is stories it is up to us to tell fact from opinion and truth from fiction...
Instead of simply 'deciding which stories are facts' how about we just rely on whatever 'stories' are backed up by evidence? I prefer that.
Everything we say is opinion. The difference is that I reserve judgement and keep my opinions informed on evidence...while you inform your opinions with personal bias and a desire to see what isn't there. That's pretty par for the course for you conspiracy theorists.
That is a lie. "The evidence has been falsified." It is impossible. I could never break the law. I am the law!-Judge Dreadd
0
@ Blackshogunfox
Not to make you think I'm some kind of internet superspy or something, because I'm totally not, but your points might seem slightly more valid if you used proper grammar and took much time to make your sentences legible to the rest of us.
That is, unless you're fighting some kind of shadow war against the forces of Big Education and Big Dictionary.
Not to make you think I'm some kind of internet superspy or something, because I'm totally not, but your points might seem slightly more valid if you used proper grammar and took much time to make your sentences legible to the rest of us.
That is, unless you're fighting some kind of shadow war against the forces of Big Education and Big Dictionary.
0
Wilhelm_van_middernacht wrote...
@ BlackshogunfoxNot to make you think I'm some kind of internet superspy or something, because I'm totally not, but your points might seem slightly more valid if you used proper grammar and took much time to make your sentences legible to the rest of us.
That is, unless you're fighting some kind of shadow war against the forces of Big Education and Big Dictionary.
Ha. Thanks for the heads up. I noticed that as well. I edit sometimes and still screw up. Now that is out of the way. Are you a spy?
0
BlackShogunFox wrote...
Wilhelm_van_middernacht wrote...
@ BlackshogunfoxNot to make you think I'm some kind of internet superspy or something, because I'm totally not, but your points might seem slightly more valid if you used proper grammar and took much time to make your sentences legible to the rest of us.
That is, unless you're fighting some kind of shadow war against the forces of Big Education and Big Dictionary.
Ha. Thanks for the heads up. I noticed that as well. I edit sometimes and still screw up. Now that is out of the way. Are you a spy?
Oh come on. If I were a spy, do you think I'd tell you? I'd tell Lundi so he could protect me! :D