How can capitalism be so conductive to growth and innovation when it can be so easily hijacked by the greed of a select few. A socialistic society tends to level the playing field so anybody has a shot at what they want to achieve. If living in such a place where everybody can count on getting what they need in exchange for slightly higher taxes, it sounds good to me.
A socialistic country centers all power in the hands of a select few. The government ends up with all the power instead of the people. I believe we all know how that works out.
Forcing "equality" only increases unemployment. Why? because socialism takes away from the people who make jobs (A.k.a. the rich). As for the tax comment. The people who pay the taxes are the rich. Speaking from the American side in taxes. The middle and lower class bitch, whine and moan about taxes and yet they pay next to nothing. The bottom 50% of the tax bracket pays nothing or next to nothing in taxes.
EEEY. NOTHEENG AGAINST THE LOWER MIDDLE CLASS, BEETCH.
j/k
But seriously we sort of do have a right not to have to become completely poor just because someone needs an operation. Sort of makes sense that the government would at least pay a part of it, and that money also needs to come from somewhere.
And we don't pay no nothing or no next to nothing in no taxes not.
(possibly /complete unfamiliarity with American economics, but surely /lower middle class-coloured standpoint)
And I do not, in fact, imagine fat businessmen when imagine rich people, possibly helped by the fact that I know a few rich people myself. Who happen to happily pay their taxes and don't seem to suffer at all. Or maybe they just seem rich in my lower middle class eyes.
the top 1% pay about 40% of tax revenue.
2-5% paid 20%
6-10 paid 11%.
11-25% paid 15%
26-50%11%
40+20+11+15+11=97% of all tax revenue to the United states government came from the top 50% of income earners while the bottom half of society pays nothing.
Middle and lower class people support socialism as it's not their money that is being taken at gunpoint (yes, gunpoint because if you don't cough up then the government sends it's attack dogs out to take it from you). What supporters don't realize is that if you take money away from the people who open businesses or heavily tax businesses then that money can't be used to create jobs or fund research.
They fought because of hitler's so called living space and the vast fields that can feed the german people and.............oh they also need resources and manpower for their war effort. As a Nazi myself (please dont try to point out at my name. (as we all know....kalashnikov is russian.)I see this wrong because they smashed the molotov-ribbentrop pact. If they decided to push operation sea lion (a.k.a. invasion of britain)they might have finished the war and the U.S. didn't have to fight in the war that made them a superpower.
the top 1% pay about 40% of tax revenue.
2-5% paid 20%
6-10 paid 11%.
11-25% paid 15%
26-50%11%
40+20+11+15+11=97% of all tax revenue to the United states government came from the top 50% of income earners while the bottom half of society pays nothing.
Middle and lower class people support socialism as it's not their money that is being taken at gunpoint (yes, gunpoint because if you don't cough up then the government sends it's attack dogs out to take it from you). What supporters don't realize is that if you take money away from the people who open businesses or heavily tax businesses then that money can't be used to create jobs or fund research.
I'll add more when I get back tomorrow evening.
Oh...
My heart 'almost' bleeds for the exploited workers. Except this: The rest of those people are also working off their ass. Your "top" 50% income wouldn't exist without that.
You speak as if income == GDP/person.
That's wrong. Income is the "profit" one gains by selling their labor on the market. However here's the kicker: the top 1% earn several thousand times more than everyone else...
...even when some of them don't work. Even when their companies (of CEOs) are going bankrupt.
I'm not an enemy of rich. Hell I don't care how rich you get. What I'm concerned with is what other people have to pay for a minority to get rich.
http://www.lcurve.org/
As is, with all the "moaning" of "blue murder" and "robbery", the fact is that the quite flat tax rate hurts the poor a lot more than the rich...
...and the super rich are earning impossible fortunes while they run the USA into the ground. They demand a "free" market yet they take insane government subsidies in agriculture - look up the water racket in California - they demand "fair" competition yet they keep lobbying for more and more stringent trademark and patent rights that only favor the big players and makes entry into the market impossible for upstarts. They downsize the homeland industry, move all production overseas and cut worker benefits...
EDIT:
Who gets all that liquid capital? Farmers like Stuart Woolf, a typical specimen of a Westlands welfare queen. The Woolf family operates the “biggest farming operation in Fresno County,” receiving $4.2 million annually in subsidized water — enough to supply a city of 150,000 people — and Stuart Woolf alone got roughly $8 million in federal crop subsidies over the past decade. Yet, he recently appeared on 60 Minutes, pretending to be a struggling farmer who’s dying of thirst because government regulations enacted by big city elitists to protect some worthless little fish are cutting into his water supplies. In 2008, he did what any small farmer would do to defend his livelihood: he threatened a congressional subcommittee that he’d move his family’s farm holdings to Portugal, Spain, Turkey and even China if the feds didn’t give him more taxpayer-subsidized water.
...and get once again get insane profits, but at the expense of everyone else. They're not producing *anything* of value except money for themselves and their shareholders - who are *not* American middle class. Most shares are also in the hands of a handful elite.
This money, as far as the American economy is concerned is bogus. It has no product, no new tangible value behind it... for there was no production in the US to back up such insane "creation" of wealth.
oh , some interesting thread ^^
the taxes should be reworked , but one more important thing to change is wealth distribution
some business owners and others should earn more than some basic workers
but why should some CEO's earn more than a million times more? that's insane
you can't make a viable society with such unstable bases
and i can live in a so-named democracy , i always end with some head of state i didn't vote for and who makes what he wants , so i don't really know if that's an improvement over enlightened despotism or if it is one of them :D