beeza wrote...
This more recent post is a completely different topic from what you started with.
So you're saying everyone who's posted a reply (and all of them are great replies; a discussion that's worthy of being in SD, imo), went off topic. You were asking if Hatsune Miku, and only Hatsune Miku, is too pure to fap to? Or was it that because she is completely artificial, that she's hard to fap to?
I'm a bit annoyed at the fact you mentioned those conversations you'd like to avoid when, as stated before, EVERYONE has been completely civil, giving honest answers to what they perceived was your question.
However, all that is fine. Misinterpretations happen.
Answering your new question (in spoiler because this post is long enough as is)
I've never fapped to a voice actress, so I can't say her voice being completely artificial would be any sort of turnoff. (I'm very aware of how attractive seiyuu like Tanaka Rie and Takahashi Chiaki are.)
Side Note (for giggles I suppose):
http://myanimelist.net/people/584/Takahashi_Chiaki/pictures
http://myanimelist.net/people/60/Tanaka_Rie/pictures
Regarding Miku, I don't think she's ever voiced a sexual act, so I'm not sure where you're going on this train of thought. Unless you find her singing voice sexually arousing.
I can fap to artificial things because they are sexually arousing. In the end, that's basically all it takes, no?
Sorry I'm having a hard time trying to convey what my topic is, and it's also one that can be interpreted in a few different ways. Am I specifically saying is Miku too pure to fap to? No. I want to have a discussion on what is attractive and also (if people are willing) who and why they are too pure to fap to. Yes, I now see that it varies from person to person, but if people are willing to justify there reasons or try to explain it the best they can, we can have a conversation on it. You can see it was going well even though you protested to this being in SD from the start, and rightfully so, perhaps this wasn’t the best place for this thread. I agree that all the replies have been great and I want them to continue. What I was adding in my 2nd post was that Miku is completely artificial with no real back-story and how I had no real justification. But again this thread is not Miku specific. The responses again have been great and I like how people have posted there reasons. Now that we're posting our reasons why let’s respectfully discuss them. Let me start.
[spoil]
x-gen wrote...
I'm pretty sure such a thing would exist. After all, you don't usually hear people fapping to Mother Mary.
That said, there's nothing restricting you from doing so if you wished to, either. It's really depending on the psychology of the person in question. There are schemas that people associate with certain things, such as "a four legged creature that is furry, has ears and fangs, goes 'woof' is a dog." But that concept can change, as there are dogs that are not furry, or ones that don't bark (or even four legged).
Same goes with sexual attraction. People have a schema of "sexy woman" that they will use as a representative sample for others that they regard as a symbol of their sexual desires. If a woman does not fall into this category, she will be an unlikely candidate for fap material (like an old lady).
It's due to this categorization of sexiness that we have differences in sexual taste. Some people like loli, others like tentacles. Some people like domination, others prefer to humuliate. But because the foundations of the schema is rested in thoughts, we can change to adapt to things we don't used to think as "sexy." This is how people can see things they don't think is sexy suddenly becoming sexy (like nuns) or vice-versa (Miku becoming a muse).
Agreed, something that I don't even notice can one day become irresistible. So what one day is pure and untouchable can later become lusted after. Also a nice add with the Mother Mary example, that is a good point.