nateriver10 wrote...
If the word «victim» in that sentence contains an emotional charge (i.e. he/she who is suffering unjustly at the hands of others) your point becomes shady in the sense that it makes be obviously wrong. My point is that, in overly-sensitive cases, the «victim» isn't a victim at all.
Think of it as a bad choice of words.
nateriver10 wrote...
I am perfectly aware that bullying is a dangerous subject. But I am also become increasingly aware that our social norms are being pushed to a state in which we won't be able to say anything at all with fear of offending people. It is slashing away at free speech and taking a small, but significant step, towards some sort of Orwellian nightmare. I'm not saying bullied kids should «grow a pair» as a way to fix their problems but I am saying that easily offended people should.
I disagree that our freedom of speech (in regards to self expression) is being jeopardized anymore than it has ever been. If anything, we are allowed to be more liberal with conveying ourselves through speech than ever before, thanks to the anonymity granted to us through the internet. The only people I see having a harder time expressing themselves are those stuck in an older world view, which is not a new occurrence.
I'll grant your the "Orwellian nightmare" in regards to the American government spying net and Guantanamo Bay's "indefinite detention without trial of assumed American terrorist" that could make anyone on the internet opposed US conduct out to be anti-government possible extremist. But off topic...
nateriver10 wrote...
We have been going for a while but it equates to the discussion in the sense that we talking about offense caused in people (some sort of basic, very basic definition of bullying). And I came up (or at least tried) with counter-examples as an attempt to show that sometimes offense can be caused when bullying does not exist. And the teeth example is more or less supposed to be silly. I actually remembered it from a sitcom called Scrubs in which a guy told that to a girl and she, being very obsessive and insecure, became very self-aware and uncomfortable. I know it is a sitcom but trivial things can cause offense. My beef with this issue is when people call others bullies for this.
I understand people can be offended when no offense is intended, but I am skeptical towards the idea that people commonly infer bullying when this is done.
nateriver10 wrote...
You may be a stoic (something I am in some aspects and wish I could be more of in others) but it shouldn't be a meh reaction. At least with regards to the first case for it pertains to a group of women who, feeling bullied by the word «bossy» began raising money in order to censor that word. It is completely insane and I think, a good example as to when those who perceived to be bullied take wrong actions.
I'm hardly stotic, I just see them blowing off steam, or to rephrase, looking for something to focus their anguish on. I don't expect anything out of this other than a bad performance in the eyes of everyone else. And, that to give it attention reinforces such behavior. I don't agree with their conduct or immediate goal, so it ends with that, for me.
Bullying infers someone with out a means and/or will to oppose someone causing them some sort of harm (kind of have to change my definition now). In regards to these women, they are not helpless, they are fighting back, in my opinion "a little directionless", but they are making an attempt to change their situation for the better. They, as in the group, in regards to "true" cases of sexism and discrimination, can and have the will to, minimize (no perfect world) their role as victims. In the end, I feel that their plight falls under a different category of conflict, not quite bullying. I don't think they would refer to themselves as being bullied either, but I'm generalizing anyways, so this doesn't add up to very much.
Feminist is a topic too controversial and too large for me to feel comfortable discussing. I've done some independent studying of, but it's still too much I don't know yet. The only thing I can say with confidence is, that labeling a few, or even one group, as a representation of all feminist is disingenuous... Or maybe just "false" is a better word.
nateriver10 wrote...
The context in which that example occured to me was in conversation with a group of friends, some which I knew quite well, others were friends of friends and others were friends of friends of friends. The one that did go balistic was someone who's face I hardly recognized. I don't think he cared about my opinion, he deeply cared about his. So, a statement regarding historical evidence (something which bores the living hell out of most people in the world) was enough to trigger a harsh response. Couldn't it be the same when clumsy girls fall in gym class? Maybe or maybe not. I dunno. I could also really bully that Christian dude (although I was close enough to get punched as it was), I could have been vitriolic but I wasn't and it was enough to offend him. If this happens, as it does in the bossy case, it seems as though bullying is more clearly definied with intention rather than offense. Granted, some people many be bullies without realizing but I think in that situation, they would easily be called to reason and stop. Unless they were sociopaths which bullies, more or less, are.
Something I try to hold onto whenever I give an opinion, because it was something I did often when I was younger and I don't want to pull that mistake again, is to not hold a difference of opinion as a personal insult. It is something rather common, people interpreting the expression of an opinion, different from their own, as an insult of ones own character. (Take opinions in games and how volatile those conversations become in youtube "reviews".) I haven't viewed this, in myself or others, as bullying. Nor have I seen others feel as if they were being bullied for this. Trolled, yes, but not bullied.
As for the gym girl, think of it this way. She herself doesn't see herself being bullied, but feels the same as someone who is bullied. She is being treated in the same fashion of dismissal of her character/worth through lack of ability.
This is what I mean by bullying behavior, we can name it differently, if you want, it's behavior that causes emotional, and possibly indirect physical, harm for others. Both of which, bullying and the behavior, could be reduced through what I view as "strengthening empathic responses in children (and adults)".