ShaggyJebus wrote...
The main question I have for everyone is, how do you find a balance between being skeptical of everything and being flat-out paranoid?
I somehow believed that being skeptical is just a sophisticated way of saying paranoid.
I believed to a certain extent what the newspaper and TV said about the news, even if that is what the media/government wants us to know.
I believed to a certain extent of what scientist claim and said about science, even if I do not even know science the slightest.
I believe it if one day I smell a food scent and identify it as chicken while 5 other individuals identify it as fish. I would question and doubt myself.
In short, I believed what the majority believes, but to a certain extent, as I will always have room for doubt, since "knowledge" is ever changing with time, there might be some evidence in the future that contradicts what we have all learned up to this date, and I am willing to believe that if there is concrete evidence, and with that, the majority views will change and so will I
ShaggyJebus wrote...
Do you sit comfortably, believing that since you are not schizophrenic, you do not have to worry about that sort of thing? Or do you worry that you can never truly know whether something is a delusion or not, because only other people can classify you as schizophrenic or delusional, and who's to say that they are not delusions?
In this world, to live a comfortable life, the majority must be pleased. Any attempt to bash the world with claims about your "truth" and their "delusions" will not be taken seriously and a waste of effort. I'd try to seek something with a reward, and live happily, rather then seek the truth.
Even if I doubt something, I would prioritise my comfort life first and cease to cause any trouble, and keep it to myself only. Since IMO, this isnt worth it.