neko-chan wrote...
Jash2o2 wrote...
Did you know that out of all studies done regarding marijuana, the only test done with negative results was a study in which the test subjects were monkeys that were deprived of oxygen which is what resulted in the brain cell damage.
What? Okay, why are you telling me this? Are you implying that ALL THE OTHER test and numerous studies ending up with the subjects having zero side effects? As if, there actually were numerous other test done, and out of all these test, only this faulty test done on monkies was the one with negative side effects?
I didn't think it was neccessary to point out that there isn't a large swath of data floating around as to the medical consequences of smoking marijuana like there is on smoking tabacco. There aren't any test being done subjecting people to smoking purely marijuana, and even the research on marijuana users is usually skewed because those people almost always smoke tabacco too or consume alcohol.
However, basically all doctors agree inhaling something into your lungs is going to have a very negative side effect on your lungs, as well as teeth, brain, and heart. Unfortunately, there isn't solid facts or data on the damage you are doing to your body - NOT because there is no damage being done, but because their isn't enough reseach being done.
But since the research being done right now doesn't scream, "Hey everybody! This stuff is harmless!" I'm filled with apathy when it comes to legalizing marijuana.
The fact is that there has never been a single death from marijuana usage, smoking or otherwise. Another fact is that there are plenty of deaths and negative side affects caused by over the counter and prescription drugs. Another fact is that marijuana is known as a schedule 1 drug in the U.S.A. Substances in this schedule have a high potential for abuse, have no currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States, and there is a lack of accepted safety for use of the drug or other substance under medical supervision. Marijuana does not apply to any of those.
The point is that while it may not be 100% harmless, although I believe it to be, it is nearly irrelevant when arguing legality when just about any other medicine out there is worse. Plus marijuana is one of the few drugs that allows you to negate the potential negative effects simply by using another means of getting the THC, such as a vaporizer or baking it into food.
In my opinion, it being harmful is the worst argument for keeping it illegal. I believe that if someone wants to alter their mind or body, that is their right. You don't think that people should be allowed to smoke it with their children watching, but is it not worse with alcohol? Alcoholic parents are far worse than stoned parents. It is up to the people to be responsible for their actions. I've been drunk and I've been high and one thing I've learned from that is that alcohol is worse in terms of mental and physical effects.
But I digress. I find this all to be irrelevant because I believe in the notion that the government should not dictate how people take care of themselves. A government like that is one that would dictate people's diets as a means to control an obesity problem. Quite frankly I'm surprised this hasn't happened yet, but I fear that this mindset that the government must take care of us will lead to something similar one day.