GourmetPrince wrote...
I don't really like to think that anyone actually "wins" debates. I watch it as a trial of the running mate's abilities to respond quickly and accurately. As well as stay on topic and discuss the question at hand. Something Palin was not able to do.
That's a good point. It's not like points are added or deducted throughout these presidential and vice presidential debates. There aren't really any "winners" or "losers." The debates just reflect whether a person him/herself is a winner or a loser.
Like back in the day, between Nixon and JFK. Nixon didn't
lose the debate; he just showed that he was a horrible man who wasn't fit to run a herd of cattle, let alone the entire country.