Black Jesus JC wrote...
Because it was a terrorist attack that killed innocent people, and destroyed a symbolic location to many people.
Is it really so bad to take one day to remember those who were killed?
I think the question should be, "Why don't we spend more time remembering those that died?"
The Japanese tsunami has been brought up, so I'll use it as an example. A little less than ten years from now, will we hold a memorial for the over 15,000 people that died in the tsunami? Will we devote countless hours of television to the event, which has had, and will continue to have, drastic ramifications? I highly doubt it.
The 9/11 attacks killed a lot of people, were a landmark attack on American soil by foreigners, and resulted in a lot of changes (if the attacks had never occurred, we wouldn't have full-body-scan machines at airports, for one thing). We should remember that they occurred. But other things happen, too, that result in many deaths, can create a snowball effect that results in even more deaths, and can drastically change how a nation acts and is run.
I think for Americans, it is easy to remember 9/11 because two very tall buildings are gone, and anybody flying on a plane has to go through a lot of hassle. It is easy for us to be reminded of what happened, so we cannot forget about it, unlike with other things. (How many people think about the disaster in New Orleans due to Hurricane Katrina?) But we do not think about upheavals in other countries or genocides or other things that occur outside our boundaries, outside what we experience ourselves.
Remembering 9/11 is fine, but why don't we remember everything else that happens in the world?