saibot wrote...
It is correct that there are many important biological, physical and psychological differences between human females and human males.
Contrary, to what some people try to say these differences don't really make a clear superior gender.
I think that, if anything, the genders complement eachother.
However, despite the natural strenghts of the genders, great variations are possible even so. Without doubt there are many women in this world who could, without much work, beat me physically and I'm not solely refering to anabolica satuated mountains of muscle.
If woman who, in most cases, have a slower build up of muscle, exceed my physical abilities through hard work then there is no doubt that they are superior to me, in that regard.
And modern science has shown that women have natural qualities that are useful for more than just child bearing and raising.
Trying to oppress women could even be detrimental to a modern society, riding the society of valuable natural resources.
Of course, there are bad women. Just as there are bad men.
And, yes, there might even be some good men and good women.
There is nothing that rationally indicates that all women are lying, cheating whores, just as there is nothing that indicates that all men are brutish barely contained rapists-in-the-making.
Of course,
actual equality between the genders isn't possible, just as there is no equality between me and the person next to me, regardless of gender.
But the same rights
and duties for both can and should be a reality.
In short, I only rate a human by his or her personality and deeds. Of course, even I fall into the trap of prejudice at times but I always try my best.
no wonder I like you Saibot. You couldn't me more right. of course, there actually is no right or wrong, it's a matter of opinion, everything sooner or later falls into an either biological or psychological logic. But I couldn't agree more with you Saibot.