Loki1321 wrote...
Dude. I play dota efficiently.
You obviously do not understand anything about dota if you think you can "find" the best builds by "experimenting". This is why there are terrible dota players. You have to study up if you want to do well. And I don't really find it fun to "test" item builds that will not work and/or be inferior. It ruins the game in my opinion, for you and other players. And by standard I mean usual build pros use. Well, this was from before his nerf so it might be a bit different now. And BH doesn't need that much regen.
Why don't you use grammar properly from now on too, yeah?
Sorry to put you down, bro...
But you're the one who doesn't understand DotA.
The pros you look up to? Used to be lowly scrubs AKA "terrible dota players".
The builds you're saying that are standard? Born from experimenting. Born from probably a hundred other experiments that resulted in a win/loss for the whole team.
The reason there are even "standard builds", as you say so, in DotA, is because everyone is keeping on experimenting with different builds, with different strategies.
FACT: Every pro player in DotA experiments with all kinds of builds. Builds that you may think is stupid. Every "standard build" that is out right now was considered, at some point, stupid and inefficient.
They're considered stupid and inefficient
until one of the pros shows it off and say "hey guys, this is a pretty good build".
Which by then, people, the ones who look up to the pros, suddenly start to call it a "standard build" just because a pro managed to make it work.
TL;DR Everyone has their own ways to build a Hero. Just because there's a guide that tells you "this is the most standard way to build your hero", doesn't mean it's the only efficient way.
Like Badguy said, you awfully sound a lot like a LoL player, with the whole "I'm good at playing DotA because I follow a build that was built by pros".
There are few-to-none limitations as to what kind of builds you can create on a hero.