I probably fixed that on the website, but I submitted the magazine version as a uni piece close to deadline, as if I was going to proof read it.
Rbz wrote...
As for your new playground:
Subtle humour, yo.
Unless that was a sarcastic quip, then by the power delegated to me by Phoenix Wright, I call objec-BULLSHIT. I've read all the articles and they're mostly meh. "Meh" as in "okay." The one on the extended cut was my favorite for obvious reasons. Reasons that we both appreciate. My only problem with the articles is the horrendous spelling errors. Fucking Vince Goldman. Speaking of whom, is that your pseudonym? Hard not to suspect when I see that britnig write this shit (in addition to every article): "You’ll find that Batman has reach, but Robin has flexibility."
Subtle in the sense that they aren't packed with jokes. They aren't meant to be be uproariously funny, it isn't Cracked. They're based around one central premise and then written up in news style. It is basically the Onion for games at the moment. There's a balance between being unbelievably wacky and believable but still entertaining, which I'm still grappling with.
If you consider it as niche specific emulation I don't think I'm doing too badly. I'm getting another writer on-board so that should ease the workload and ensure a more consistent quality. I realise that purely news writing does get tiresome to read as much as to write, and I want to do features as well, but they are incredibly time consuming.
I'm totally open to suggestions on how to improve. I obviously want people to enjoy it, otherwise I wouldn't spend time every day brainstorming and writing. But I need constructive feedback to do that.
What I would say is this - how many games humour sites are there right now? Because if you don't support sites while they're average to decent, they'll never get good. A community provides a shield as well as affirmation of the idea.